These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35849390)

  • 1. A meta-analysis on the effect of visual attention on choice.
    Bhatnagar R; Orquin JL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2265-2283. PubMed ID: 35849390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual environment and attention in decision making.
    Orquin JL; Lahm ES; Stojić H
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Jun; 147(6):597-617. PubMed ID: 34843300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Légaré F; Col NF; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Thomson R; Trevena L; Wu JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jan; (1):CD001431. PubMed ID: 24470076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does deciding among morally relevant options feel like making a choice? How morality constrains people's sense of choice.
    Kouchaki M; Smith IH; Savani K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 115(5):788-804. PubMed ID: 30047759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The power of last fixation: Biasing simple choices by gaze-contingent manipulation.
    Liu HZ; Zhou YB; Wei ZH; Jiang CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103106. PubMed ID: 32512321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention biases preferential choice by enhancing an option's value.
    Pleskac TJ; Yu S; Grunevski S; Liu T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Apr; 152(4):993-1010. PubMed ID: 36301270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dynamic computational model of gaze and choice in multi-attribute decisions.
    Yang X; Krajbich I
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):52-70. PubMed ID: 35025570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feeling certain: Gut choice, the true self, and attitude certainty.
    Maglio SJ; Reich T
    Emotion; 2019 Aug; 19(5):876-888. PubMed ID: 30198736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions.
    Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The consistency of visual attention to losses and loss sensitivity across valuation and choice.
    Ashby NJS; Yechiam E; Ben-Eliezer D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1791-1809. PubMed ID: 30507234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social decoys: Leveraging choice architecture to alter social preferences.
    Chang LW; Cikara M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Aug; 115(2):206-223. PubMed ID: 30024241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Covert attention leads to fast and accurate decision-making.
    Perkovic S; Schoemann M; Lagerkvist CJ; Orquin JL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Mar; 29(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 35511553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A generalized distance function for preferential choices.
    Berkowitsch NA; Scheibehenne B; Rieskamp J; Matthäus M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 25677976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context influences decision-making in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A comparison of traditional and novel choice-impulsivity paradigms.
    Patros CH; Alderson RM; Lea SE; Tarle SJ
    Child Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb; 23(2):242-254. PubMed ID: 26695841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for the last-sampling bias in perceptual decision-making.
    Zhu T
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105049. PubMed ID: 35131576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Col NF; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Légaré F; Thomson R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Oct; (10):CD001431. PubMed ID: 21975733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice protection for feeling-focused decisions.
    Maglio SJ; Reich T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1704-1718. PubMed ID: 31944811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention and choice across domains.
    Smith SM; Krajbich I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1810-1826. PubMed ID: 30247061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preference reversals during risk elicitation.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Martin R; Hall L; Johansson P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):585-589. PubMed ID: 31318260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making.
    Orquin JL; Mueller Loose S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):190-206. PubMed ID: 23845447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.