125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35849543)
1. Acute inhibition of hospital and medical laboratory wastewater on activated sludge.
Partal R; Murat Hocaoglu S; Yigit NÖ
Environ Technol; 2024 Jan; 45(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 35849543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxic compounds biodegradation and toxicity of high strength wastewater treated under elevated nitrogen concentration in the activated sludge and membrane bioreactor systems.
Boonnorat J; Boonapatcharoen N; Prachanurak P; Honda R; Phanwilai S
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Aug; 592():252-261. PubMed ID: 28319712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis of characteristics of microbial communities in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge process].
Ouyang K; Liu JX
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Feb; 30(2):499-503. PubMed ID: 19402506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in bacterial community structure in a full-scale membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
Hashimoto K; Tsutsui H; Takada K; Hamada H; Sakai K; Inoue D; Sei K; Soda S; Yamashita K; Tsuji K; Hashimoto T; Ike M
J Biosci Bioeng; 2016 Jul; 122(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 26811223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Filterability of membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge: impacts of polyelectrolytes and mixing with conventional activated sludge.
Yigit NO; Civelekoglu G; Cinar O; Kitis M
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(3):659-69. PubMed ID: 20150702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of sludge filtration characteristics between a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge process].
Sun BS; Zhang HF; Qi GS
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Feb; 27(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 16686196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology.
Lares M; Ncibi MC; Sillanpää M; Sillanpää M
Water Res; 2018 Apr; 133():236-246. PubMed ID: 29407704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effluent quality of a conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor system treating hospital wastewater.
Pauwels B; Fru Ngwa F; Deconinck S; Verstraete W
Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 16583824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nitrification performance in a membrane bioreactor treating industrial wastewater.
Dvořák L; Svojitka J; Wanner J; Wintgens T
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4412-21. PubMed ID: 23764592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge inoculation in a hybrid process scheme concept to assist overloaded conventional activated sludge (CAS) process operations.
Fenu A; Roels J; Van Damme S; Wambecq T; Weemaes M; Thoeye C; De Gueldre G; Van De Steene B
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 22699354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biodegradation and Metabolism of Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in the Bioaugmented Activated Sludge Batch Bioreactor System by Heterotrophic and Nitrifying Bacteria.
Islam MS; Zhou H; Zytner RG
Water Environ Res; 2018 Feb; 90(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 29348000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge processes in the treatment of Moroccan domestic wastewater.
Kitanou S; Tahri M; Bachiri B; Mahi M; Hafsi M; Taky M; Elmidaoui A
Water Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 78(5-6):1129-1136. PubMed ID: 30339537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of domestic wastewater toxicity on anaerobic membrane-bioreactor (MBR) performances.
Saddoud A; Abdelkafi S; Sayadi S
Environ Technol; 2009 Dec; 30(13):1361-9. PubMed ID: 20088200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in wastewater treatment performance and activated sludge properties of a membrane bioreactor at low temperature operation.
Zhang C; Wang G; Hu Z
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Sep; 16(9):2199-207. PubMed ID: 25003580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations imposed by conventional fine bubble diffusers on the design of a high-loaded membrane bioreactor (HL-MBR).
Kim SY; Garcia HA; Lopez-Vazquez CM; Milligan C; Livingston D; Herrera A; Matosic M; Curko J; Brdjanovic D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34285-34300. PubMed ID: 30737715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integration of microbial fuel cell techniques into activated sludge wastewater treatment processes to improve nitrogen removal and reduce sludge production.
Gajaraj S; Hu Z
Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():151-7. PubMed ID: 25014565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular-based detection of potentially pathogenic bacteria in membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems treating municipal wastewater: a case study.
Harb M; Hong PY
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Feb; 24(6):5370-5380. PubMed ID: 28013467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effectiveness of membrane bioreactors, conventional secondary treatment, and chlorine and UV disinfection to remove microorganisms from municipal wastewaters.
Francy DS; Stelzer EA; Bushon RN; Brady AM; Williston AG; Riddell KR; Borchardt MA; Spencer SK; Gellner TM
Water Res; 2012 Sep; 46(13):4164-78. PubMed ID: 22682268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
