BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35849575)

  • 21. Mendelian Randomization With Repeated Measures of a Time-varying Exposure: An Application of Structural Mean Models.
    Shi J; Swanson SA; Kraft P; Rosner B; De Vivo I; Hernán MA
    Epidemiology; 2022 Jan; 33(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 34847085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using multivariable Mendelian randomization to estimate the causal effect of bone mineral density on osteoarthritis risk, independently of body mass index.
    Hartley A; Sanderson E; Granell R; Paternoster L; Zheng J; Smith GD; Southam L; Hatzikotoulas K; Boer CG; van Meurs J; Zeggini E; ; Gregson CL; Tobias JH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 51(4):1254-1267. PubMed ID: 34897459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pleiotropy robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization.
    Grant AJ; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5813-5830. PubMed ID: 34342032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
    Burgess S; Labrecque JA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomisation with dependent instruments.
    Shapland CY; Thompson JR; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):985-1001. PubMed ID: 30485479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interpretation and Potential Biases of Mendelian Randomization Estimates With Time-Varying Exposures.
    Labrecque JA; Swanson SA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 30239571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conditional inference in cis-Mendelian randomization using weak genetic factors.
    Patel A; Gill D; Newcombe P; Burgess S
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3458-3471. PubMed ID: 37337418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
    Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology.
    Lee K; Lim CY
    J Lipid Atheroscler; 2019 Sep; 8(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 32821701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of nonrandom selection mechanisms on the causal effect estimation for two-sample Mendelian randomization methods.
    Yu Y; Hou L; Shi X; Sun X; Liu X; Yu Y; Yuan Z; Li H; Xue F
    PLoS Genet; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1010107. PubMed ID: 35298462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
    Grant AJ; Burgess S
    Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
    Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mendelian randomization accounting for complex correlated horizontal pleiotropy while elucidating shared genetic etiology.
    Cheng Q; Zhang X; Chen LS; Liu J
    Nat Commun; 2022 Oct; 13(1):6490. PubMed ID: 36310177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using Mendelian randomization to investigate a possible causal relationship between adiposity and increased bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in children.
    Kemp JP; Sayers A; Smith GD; Tobias JH; Evans DM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1560-1572. PubMed ID: 27215616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
    Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.