These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35849610)

  • 1. Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.
    Sanderson JA; Farrell S; Ecker UKH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271566. PubMed ID: 35849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
    Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Swire B; Chang D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 21359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to misinformation retractions in the continued influence paradigm: Evidence for stability.
    McIlhiney P; Gignac GE; Weinborn M; Ecker UK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jul; 75(7):1259-1271. PubMed ID: 34541938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis.
    McIlhiney P; Gignac GE; Ecker UKH; Kennedy BL; Weinborn M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0283951. PubMed ID: 37018324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do doorways really matter: Investigating memory benefits of event segmentation in a virtual learning environment.
    Logie MR; Donaldson DI
    Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104578. PubMed ID: 33422863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The rational continued influence of misinformation.
    Connor Desai SA; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104453. PubMed ID: 33011527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Tang DT
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1087-100. PubMed ID: 21156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Kan IP; Pizzonia KL; Drummey AB; Mikkelsen EJV
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Nov; 6(1):76. PubMed ID: 34837587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexibility of event boundaries in autobiographical memory.
    Hohman TJ; Peynircioğlu ZF; Beason-Held LL
    Memory; 2013; 21(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 22989194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval context determines whether event boundaries impair or enhance temporal order memory.
    Wen T; Egner T
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105145. PubMed ID: 35483158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation.
    Xu Y; Wong R; He S; Veldre A; Andrews S
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1112-1127. PubMed ID: 32430888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
    Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-learning stress reduces the misinformation effect: effects of psychosocial stress on memory updating.
    Nitschke JP; Chu S; Pruessner JC; Bartz JA; Sheldon S
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2019 Apr; 102():164-171. PubMed ID: 30562688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event segmentation and event boundary advantage: Role of attention and postencoding processing.
    Pradhan R; Kumar D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1542-1555. PubMed ID: 34928683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 34533754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction?
    Braun BE; Zaragoza MS; Chrobak QM; Ithisuphalap J
    Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 33290185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hippocampal-Medial Prefrontal Event Segmentation and Integration Contribute to Episodic Memory Formation.
    Liu W; Shi Y; Cousins JN; Kohn N; Fernández G
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Feb; 32(5):949-969. PubMed ID: 34398213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory updating after retrieval: when new information is false or correct.
    Carneiro P; Lapa A; Finn B
    Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1156-1175. PubMed ID: 34412559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.