439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35849913)
21. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.
Coxon K; Chisholm A; Malouf R; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):103. PubMed ID: 28359258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How is high quality research evidence used in everyday decisions about induction of labour between pregnant women and maternity care professionals? An exploratory study.
Farnworth A; Graham RH; Haighton CA; Robson SC
Midwifery; 2021 Sep; 100():103030. PubMed ID: 34048941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A qualitative study of factors that influence midwives' practice in relation to low-risk women's oral intake in labour in Australia.
Tadaumi M; Sweet L; Graham K
Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e455-e463. PubMed ID: 31796342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Midwives' and women's experiences with respectful maternity care around the globe: A meta-synthesis.
Shiindi-Mbidi TSN; Downing C; Temane A
Women Birth; 2023 Sep; 36(5):e461-e470. PubMed ID: 37149496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What are pregnant women told about models of maternity care in Australia? A retrospective study of women's reports.
Stevens G; Thompson R; Kruske S; Watson B; Miller YD
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Oct; 97(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 25085552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Maternity health care: The experiences of Sub-Saharan African women in Sub-Saharan Africa and Australia.
Mohale H; Sweet L; Graham K
Women Birth; 2017 Aug; 30(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 27955951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Munabi-Babigumira S; Glenton C; Lewin S; Fretheim A; Nabudere H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD011558. PubMed ID: 29148566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The un-silencing of Japanese women's voices in maternity care: A hermeneutic phenomenological study of the woman-midwife relationship.
Doering K; McAra-Couper J; Gilkison A
Midwifery; 2022 Sep; 112():103407. PubMed ID: 35750006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How to Make the Hospital an Option Again: Midwives' and Obstetricians' Experiences with a Designated Clinic for Women Who Request Different Care than Recommended in the Guidelines.
Opdam F; Dillen JV; Vries M; Hollander M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34770141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of a student-led midwifery group practice: A woman's perspective.
Stulz V; Elmir DR; Reilly H
Midwifery; 2020 Jul; 86():102691. PubMed ID: 32208228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Women's expectations and experiences of maternity care in NSW--what women highlight as most important.
Jenkins MG; Ford JB; Morris JM; Roberts CL
Women Birth; 2014 Sep; 27(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 24746379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality of midwifery led care: assessing the effects of different models of continuity for women's satisfaction.
Morgan M; Fenwick N; McKenzie C; Wolfe CD
Qual Health Care; 1998 Jun; 7(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 10180794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How optimal caseload midwifery can modify predictors for preterm birth in young women: Integrated findings from a mixed methods study.
Allen J; Kildea S; Stapleton H
Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():30-38. PubMed ID: 27498186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How a perineal care bundle impacts midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals: A critical, reflexive thematic analysis.
Allen J; Small K; Lee N
Women Birth; 2022 Feb; 35(1):e1-e9. PubMed ID: 33485817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What influences rural women's choices in maternity care: A qualitative exploratory study.
Russell K; Manias E; Nicholson P
Nurs Health Sci; 2021 Dec; 23(4):825-833. PubMed ID: 34245099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Midwives' experiences of facilitating informed decision-making - a narrative literature review.
Kloester J; Willey S; Hall H; Brand G
Midwifery; 2022 Jun; 109():103322. PubMed ID: 35358936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Care providers' views and experiences of postnatal care in private hospitals in Victoria, Australia.
Rayner JA; McLachlan HL; Peters L; Forster DA
Midwifery; 2013 Jun; 29(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 23123157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. "You're a 'high-risk' customer": A qualitative study of women's experiences of receiving information from health professionals regarding health problems or complications in pregnancy.
Ray AE; Jeffrey KN; Nair PH; Vu QD; King F; Schmied V
Women Birth; 2022 Sep; 35(5):e477-e486. PubMed ID: 34974953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Women's, midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of a structured process to document refusal of recommended maternity care.
Jenkinson B; Kruske S; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Reynolds M; Kildea S
Women Birth; 2016 Dec; 29(6):531-541. PubMed ID: 27289330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinician perspectives of pregnant women's participation in antiemetic decision-making: A qualitative study.
Blake Gornall A; Hutchinson AM; Redley B
Nurs Health Sci; 2022 Mar; 24(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 35174947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
