These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35851440)
1. Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability. Valsecchi M; Turatto M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):649-666. PubMed ID: 35851440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Habituation to onsets is controlled by spatially selective distractor expectation. Turatto M; Valsecchi M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 36395053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Habituation to visual onsets is affected by local and global distractors rate. De Tommaso M; Turatto M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2531-2537. PubMed ID: 36977908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ignoring visual distractors: Habituation to onsets is driven by time-based expectation. Turatto M; De Tommaso M Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 36284071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering. Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Habituation (of attentional capture) is not what you think it is. Turatto M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 37339053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms. van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task. van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency. Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation. Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture. Failing M; Theeuwes J Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Filtering visual onsets via habituation: A context-specific long-term memory of irrelevant stimuli. Turatto M; Bonetti F; Pascucci D Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1028-1034. PubMed ID: 28547537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression. Jagini KK; Sunny MM Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability. Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]