These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35851440)

  • 21. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning.
    Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning.
    Hanne AA; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1672. PubMed ID: 36717593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?
    Burgess E; Hauck C; De Pooter E; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):634-648. PubMed ID: 36207664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short-term and long-term plasticity in the visual-attention system: Evidence from habituation of attentional capture.
    Turatto M; Pascucci D
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Apr; 130():159-69. PubMed ID: 26927305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.
    Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 29116615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.
    Goschy H; Bakos S; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1195. PubMed ID: 25414676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
    Duncan D; Theeuwes J
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Habituation of oculomotor capture by sudden onsets: Stimulus specificity, spontaneous recovery and dishabituation.
    Bonetti F; Turatto M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):264-284. PubMed ID: 30570321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical learning of target location and distractor location rely on different mechanisms during visual search.
    Zhou X; Hao Y; Xu S; Zhang Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):342-365. PubMed ID: 36513850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical learning in visual search reflects distractor rarity, not only attentional suppression.
    Kerzel D; Balbiani C; Rosa S; Huynh Cong S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1890-1897. PubMed ID: 35445289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A saliency-specific and dimension-independent mechanism of distractor suppression.
    Gong D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 33025466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.