These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35852201)

  • 1. Anterior cruciate ligament repair using dynamic intraligamentary stabilization provides a similarly successful outcome as all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a faster psychological recovery in moderately active patients.
    Kayaalp ME; Sürücü S; Çerçi MH; Aydın M; Mahiroğulları M
    Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2022; 33(2):406-413. PubMed ID: 35852201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Versus Primary Reconstruction of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Study.
    Kösters C; Glasbrenner J; Spickermann L; Kittl C; Domnick C; Herbort M; Raschke MJ; Schliemann B
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 48(5):1108-1116. PubMed ID: 32125875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or in Combination With Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.
    Lee DW; Kim JG; Cho SI; Kim DH
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Feb; 47(2):324-333. PubMed ID: 30640514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Augmented With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Is Equivalent to Hamstring Autograft Reconstruction at Short- and Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.
    Ambrosio L; Franco D; Vadalà G; Russo F; Papalia R
    Arthroscopy; 2024 Jul; 40(7):2121-2131.e1. PubMed ID: 38417640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Lateral Extra-Articular Procedure Augmentation on Rerupture Risk and Tegner Activity Scale Outcomes in Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Matched Comparative Study With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.
    Moussa MK; Lefèvre N; Valentin E; Coughlan A; Zgolli A; Gerometta A; Meyer A; Hardy A
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Mar; 52(4):892-901. PubMed ID: 38333967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Repair or Reconstruction? Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Hoogeslag RAG; Huis In 't Veld R; Brouwer RW; de Graaff F; Verdonschot N
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Jun; 50(7):1779-1787. PubMed ID: 35486517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Repair or Reconstruction? Two-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Hoogeslag RAG; Brouwer RW; Boer BC; de Vries AJ; Huis In 't Veld R
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(3):567-577. PubMed ID: 30822124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without lateral tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort.
    Hantouly AT; Ahmed AF; Fermin TM; Macchiarola L; Sideris V; Papakostas E; Hooghe P; Al-Khelaifi K; Olory B; Zikria B
    Int Orthop; 2023 Dec; 47(12):2991-2999. PubMed ID: 37632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined Anterior Cruciate and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction in the Professional Athlete: Clinical Outcomes From the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International Study Group in a Series of 70 Patients With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.
    Rosenstiel N; Praz C; Ouanezar H; Saithna A; Fournier Y; Hager JP; Thaunat M; Sonnery-Cottet B
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Mar; 35(3):885-892. PubMed ID: 30704884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and RAMP lesion repair on psychological status.
    Dansuk E; Kemah B; Polat G; Erdil ME
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Oct; 33(7):2873-2880. PubMed ID: 36877408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Murray MM; Fleming BC; Badger GJ; ; Freiberger C; Henderson R; Barnett S; Kiapour A; Ecklund K; Proffen B; Sant N; Kramer DE; Micheli LJ; Yen YM
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 May; 48(6):1305-1315. PubMed ID: 32298131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in gait pattern and early functional results after ACL repair are comparable to those of ACL reconstruction.
    Schliemann B; Glasbrenner J; Rosenbaum D; Lammers K; Herbort M; Domnick C; Raschke MJ; Kösters C
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Feb; 26(2):374-380. PubMed ID: 28674740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus conventional ACL reconstruction: A matched study on return to work.
    Bieri KS; Scholz SM; Kohl S; Aghayev E; Staub LP
    Injury; 2017 Jun; 48(6):1243-1248. PubMed ID: 28318538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is Treatment of Segond Fracture Necessary With Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
    Melugin HP; Johnson NR; Wu IT; Levy BA; Stuart MJ; Krych AJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(4):832-838. PubMed ID: 29286825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is There Any Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 60 Years?
    Toanen C; Demey G; Ntagiopoulos PG; Ferrua P; Dejour D
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 45(4):832-837. PubMed ID: 28056178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery of ACL function after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization is resultant to restoration of ACL integrity and scar tissue formation.
    Ateschrang A; Ahmad SS; Stöckle U; Schroeter S; Schenk W; Ahrend MD
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Feb; 26(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 28741153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The psychological readiness to return to sports of patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
    Ohji S; Aizawa J; Hirohata K; Ohmi T; Mitomo S; Koga H; Yagishita K
    Phys Ther Sport; 2021 Jul; 50():114-120. PubMed ID: 33971578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study protocol: a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal brace ligament augmentation and reconstruction in individuals with an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: LIBRƎ study.
    Heusdens CHW; Zazulia K; Roelant E; Dossche L; van Tiggelen D; Roeykens J; Smits E; Vanlauwe J; Van Dyck P
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):547. PubMed ID: 31739784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term Graft Rupture Rates After Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group.
    Sonnery-Cottet B; Haidar I; Rayes J; Fradin T; Ngbilo C; Vieira TD; Freychet B; Ouanezar H; Saithna A
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Sep; 49(11):2889-2897. PubMed ID: 34351825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group.
    Rayes J; Ouanezar H; Haidar IM; Ngbilo C; Fradin T; Vieira TD; Freychet B; Sonnery-Cottet B
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Feb; 50(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 34898285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.