183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35852459)
1. Accuracy of three-dimensional printed models derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Ferraro JM; Falter J; Lee S; Watanabe K; Wu TH; Kim DG; Ko CC; Tanaka E; Deguchi T
Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):722-727. PubMed ID: 35852459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Replacement of the Distorted Dentition of the Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans for Orthognathic Surgery Planning.
Almutairi T; Naudi K; Nairn N; Ju X; Whitters J; Ayoub A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1561.e1-1561.e8. PubMed ID: 29572134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intra-oral scanner derived three-dimensional digital models: An ex vivo study.
Al-Rimawi A; Shaheen E; Albdour EA; Shujaat S; Politis C; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 30977212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of miniscrews as references in cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner digital models: study on goat heads.
Jiang Y; Chen G
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):259. PubMed ID: 31771579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital replacement of the distorted dentition acquired by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a pilot study.
Nairn NJ; Ayoub AF; Barbenel J; Moos K; Naudi K; Ju X; Khambay BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1488-93. PubMed ID: 23644040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of IOS in Full-Arch Dentate Patients Compared to CBCT Cast-Scanning. An In-Vivo Study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Pavlakis E; Kourakis G; Papavasiliou G
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Aug; 27(3):122-130. PubMed ID: 31433136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.
van Vlijmen OJ; Rangel FA; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Becking AG; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim J; Heo G; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23957664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and Reliability of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Condyle Measurements. A Human Cadaver Study.
García-Sanz V; Bellot-Arcís C; Hernández V; Serrano-Sánchez P; Guarinos J; Paredes-Gallardo V
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11993. PubMed ID: 28931867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods.
Ye J; Wang S; Wang Z; Liu Y; Sun Y; Ye H; Zhou Y
Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 36068382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
