These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35852611)

  • 21. Prospective randomized comparison of a steerable versus a non-steerable sheath for typical atrial flutter ablation.
    Matsuo S; Yamane T; Tokuda M; Date T; Hioki M; Narui R; Ito K; Yamashita S; Hama Y; Nakane T; Inada K; Shibayama K; Miyanaga S; Yoshida H; Miyazaki H; Abe K; Sugimoto K; Taniguchi I; Yoshimura M
    Europace; 2010 Mar; 12(3):402-9. PubMed ID: 20083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The benefit of tissue contact monitoring with an electrical coupling index during ablation of typical atrial flutter--a prospective randomised control trial.
    Jones MA; Webster D; Wong KC; Hayes C; Qureshi N; Rajappan K; Bashir Y; Betts TR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 41(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 25234603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conduction Recovery After Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation When Performed With or Without Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.
    Yoneda ZT; Shoemaker MB; Richardson T; Crawford D; Kanagasundram A; Shen S; Estrada JC; Holmes B; Lugo R; McHugh J; Saavedra P; Crossley G; Ellis CR; Montgomery JA; Michaud GF
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Aug; 6(8):989-996. PubMed ID: 32819535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of a high-power (50 W), ablation index-guided protocol for ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus.
    Tscholl V; Kamieniarz P; Nagel P; Landmesser U; Attanasio P; Huemer M
    J Arrhythm; 2020 Dec; 36(6):1045-1050. PubMed ID: 33335623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors of acute inefficacy and the radiofrequency energy time required for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.
    Pérez-Rodon J; Rodriguez-García J; Sarrias-Merce A; Rivas-Gandara N; Roca-Luque I; Francisco-Pascual J; Santos-Ortega A; Martín-Sánchez G; Ferreira-González I; Rodríguez-Palomares J; Evangelista-Masip A; García-Dorado D; Moya-Mitjans À
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 28265782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus depth on the ablation index for successful first-pass typical atrial flutter ablation.
    Kashiwagi M; Kuroi A; Katayama Y; Terada K; Fujita S; Hozumi T; Shimamura K; Shiono Y; Tanimoto T; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Akasaka T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22413. PubMed ID: 34789842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the maximum voltage-guided technique for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation during ongoing atrial flutter.
    Bauernfeind T; Kardos A; Foldesi C; Mihalcz A; Abraham P; Szili-Torok T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2007 Sep; 19(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17885799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of isthmus anatomy and ablation catheter on radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus.
    Da Costa A; Faure E; Thévenin J; Messier M; Bernard S; Abdel K; Robin C; Romeyer C; Isaaz K
    Circulation; 2004 Aug; 110(9):1030-5. PubMed ID: 15326078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation.
    Okamatsu H; Koyama J; Sakai Y; Negishi K; Hayashi K; Tsurugi T; Tanaka Y; Nakao K; Sakamoto T; Okumura K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2751-2758. PubMed ID: 31600006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cavotricuspid isthmus line in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with or without history of typical atrial flutter: A meta-analysis.
    Romero J; Patel K; Briceno D; Lakkireddy D; Gabr M; Diaz JC; Alviz I; Polanco D; Della Rocca DG; Mohanty P; Mohanty S; Trivedi C; Natale A; Di Biase L
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Aug; 31(8):1987-1995. PubMed ID: 32530541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. High Incidence of Low Catheter-Tissue Contact Force at the Cavotricuspid Isthmus During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter: Implications for Achieving Isthmus Block.
    Kumar S; Morton JB; Lee G; Halloran K; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):826-831. PubMed ID: 25952766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of adenosine to shorten the post ablation waiting period for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.
    Morales G; Darrat YH; Lellouche N; Kim SM; Butt M; Bidwell K; Lippert W; Ogunbayo G; Hamon D; Di Biase L; Natale A; Parrott K; Elayi CS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 28(8):876-881. PubMed ID: 28429528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of an individualized strategy of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation ablation.
    Shah DC; Sunthorn H; Burri H; Gentil-Baron P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Sep; 18(9):926-30. PubMed ID: 17655668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of bundle ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: combination of the maximum voltage-guided ablation technique and high-density electro-anatomical mapping.
    Sato H; Yagi T; Namekawa A; Ishida A; Yamashina Y; Nakagawa T; Sakuramoto M; Sato E; Yambe T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2010 Jun; 28(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 20177759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Randomized comparison of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter using an open irrigation-tip versus a large-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter.
    Ilg KJ; Kühne M; Crawford T; Chugh A; Jongnarangsin K; Good E; Pelosi F; Bogun F; Morady F; Oral H
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1007-12. PubMed ID: 21453368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Usefulness of pre-procedure cavotricuspid isthmus imaging by modified transthoracic echocardiography for predicting outcome of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.
    Chen JY; Lin KH; Liou YM; Chang KC; Huang SK
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Oct; 24(10):1148-55. PubMed ID: 21764555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characterization of a stepwise approach in cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter: A randomized study comparing three catheters.
    Rubín JM; Calvo D; Pérez D; Fidalgo A; de la Hera JM; Martínez L; Capín E; Arrizabalaga H; Carballeira L; García D; Morís C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 40(10):1052-1058. PubMed ID: 28846143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conduction delay across the cavotricuspid isthmus block line caused by the gap near the inferior vena cava: the role of conduction block in the lower lateral right atrium.
    Sekihara T; Miyazaki S; Hasegawa K; Aoyama D; Nodera M; Eguchi T; Nagao M; Kakehashi S; Mukai M; Uzui H; Tada H
    Heart Vessels; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1203-1212. PubMed ID: 35064297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maximum electrogram-guided ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.
    Cheng T; Liu Y; Kongstad O; Hertervig E; Yuan S
    J Electrocardiol; 2013; 46(6):670-5. PubMed ID: 23786856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anatomic characterization of cavotricuspid isthmus by 3D transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.
    Regoli F; Faletra F; Marcon S; Leo LA; Dequarti MC; Caputo ML; Conte G; Moccetti T; Auricchio A
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 28180237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.