BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35852738)

  • 1. A deep learning model for discriminating true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.
    Moassefi M; Faghani S; Conte GM; Kowalchuk RO; Vahdati S; Crompton DJ; Perez-Vega C; Cabreja RAD; Vora SA; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Parney IF; Trifiletti DM; Erickson BJ
    J Neurooncol; 2022 Sep; 159(2):447-455. PubMed ID: 35852738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas.
    de Godoy LL; Mohan S; Wang S; Nasrallah MP; Sakai Y; O'Rourke DM; Bagley S; Desai A; Loevner LA; Poptani H; Chawla S
    J Transl Med; 2023 Apr; 21(1):287. PubMed ID: 37118754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional echo planar spectroscopic imaging for differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Verma G; Chawla S; Mohan S; Wang S; Nasrallah M; Sheriff S; Desai A; Brem S; O'Rourke DM; Wolf RL; Maudsley AA; Poptani H
    NMR Biomed; 2019 Feb; 32(2):e4042. PubMed ID: 30556932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DC-AL GAN: Pseudoprogression and true tumor progression of glioblastoma multiform image classification based on DCGAN and AlexNet.
    Li M; Tang H; Chan MD; Zhou X; Qian X
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1139-1150. PubMed ID: 31885094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histopathology-validated machine learning radiographic biomarker for noninvasive discrimination between true progression and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma.
    Akbari H; Rathore S; Bakas S; Nasrallah MP; Shukla G; Mamourian E; Rozycki M; Bagley SJ; Rudie JD; Flanders AE; Dicker AP; Desai AS; O'Rourke DM; Brem S; Lustig R; Mohan S; Wolf RL; Bilello M; Martinez-Lage M; Davatzikos C
    Cancer; 2020 Jun; 126(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32129893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression: analysis of radiographic, biologic, and clinical clues in GBM.
    Rowe LS; Butman JA; Mackey M; Shih JH; Cooley-Zgela T; Ning H; Gilbert MR; Smart DK; Camphausen K; Krauze AV
    J Neurooncol; 2018 Aug; 139(1):145-152. PubMed ID: 29767308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pseudoprogression in GBM versus true progression in patients with glioblastoma: A multiapproach analysis.
    Sidibe I; Tensaouti F; Gilhodes J; Cabarrou B; Filleron T; Desmoulin F; Ken S; Noël G; Truc G; Sunyach MP; Charissoux M; Magné N; Lotterie JA; Roques M; Péran P; Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E; Laprie A
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Apr; 181():109486. PubMed ID: 36706959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The predictive value of absolute lymphocyte counts on tumor progression and pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Xi J; Hassan B; Katumba RGN; Khaddour K; Govindan A; Luo J; Huang J; Campian JL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):285. PubMed ID: 33726710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of Pseudoprogression from True Progressionin Glioblastoma Patients after Standard Treatment: A Machine Learning Strategy Combinedwith Radiomics Features from T
    Sun YZ; Yan LF; Han Y; Nan HY; Xiao G; Tian Q; Pu WH; Li ZY; Wei XC; Wang W; Cui GB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):17. PubMed ID: 33535988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Chawla S; Bukhari S; Afridi OM; Wang S; Yadav SK; Akbari H; Verma G; Nath K; Haris M; Bagley S; Davatzikos C; Loevner LA; Mohan S
    NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4719. PubMed ID: 35233862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stratification of pseudoprogression and true progression of glioblastoma multiform based on longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging without segmentation.
    Qian X; Tan H; Zhang J; Zhao W; Chan MD; Zhou X
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5889. PubMed ID: 27806598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.
    Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discriminating pseudoprogression and true progression in diffuse infiltrating glioma using multi-parametric MRI data through deep learning.
    Lee J; Wang N; Turk S; Mohammed S; Lobo R; Kim J; Liao E; Camelo-Piragua S; Kim M; Junck L; Bapuraj J; Srinivasan A; Rao A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20331. PubMed ID: 33230285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Role of Metabolic and Functional MRI-Systematic Review.
    Sidibe I; Tensaouti F; Roques M; Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E; Laprie A
    Biomedicines; 2022 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 35203493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic Value of Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET.
    Kebir S; Fimmers R; Galldiks N; Schäfer N; Mack F; Schaub C; Stuplich M; Niessen M; Tzaridis T; Simon M; Stoffels G; Langen KJ; Scheffler B; Glas M; Herrlinger U
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 May; 22(9):2190-6. PubMed ID: 26673798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: clinical relevance despite low incidence.
    Radbruch A; Fladt J; Kickingereder P; Wiestler B; Nowosielski M; Bäumer P; Schlemmer HP; Wick A; Heiland S; Wick W; Bendszus M
    Neuro Oncol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 25038253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence, molecular characteristics, and imaging features of "clinically-defined pseudoprogression" in newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with chemoradiation.
    Hagiwara A; Schlossman J; Shabani S; Raymond C; Tatekawa H; Abrey LE; Garcia J; Chinot O; Saran F; Nishikawa R; Henriksson R; Mason WP; Wick W; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM
    J Neurooncol; 2022 Sep; 159(3):509-518. PubMed ID: 35842871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma.
    Thomas AA; Arevalo-Perez J; Kaley T; Lyo J; Peck KK; Shi W; Zhang Z; Young RJ
    J Neurooncol; 2015 Oct; 125(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26275367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential utility of conventional MRI signs in diagnosing pseudoprogression in glioblastoma.
    Young RJ; Gupta A; Shah AD; Graber JJ; Zhang Z; Shi W; Holodny AI; Omuro AM
    Neurology; 2011 May; 76(22):1918-24. PubMed ID: 21624991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma: what neurosurgeons need to know.
    Young JS; Al-Adli N; Scotford K; Cha S; Berger MS
    J Neurosurg; 2023 Sep; 139(3):748-759. PubMed ID: 36790010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.