These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3585297)
1. The effects of visual conspicuousness and the concept of randomness on the recognition of randomness in sequences. Wiegersma S J Gen Psychol; 1987 Apr; 114(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 3585297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. See KE; Fox CR; Rottenstreich YS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1385-402. PubMed ID: 17087591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning correct responses and errors in the Hebb repetition effect: two faces of the same coin. Couture M; Lafond D; Tremblay S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 18444753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy. Wong KF; Chen HC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Operating characteristics of the implicit learning system supporting serial interception sequence learning. Sanchez DJ; Reber PJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):439-52. PubMed ID: 22201465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local redundancy governs infants' spontaneous orienting to visual-temporal sequences. Addyman C; Mareschal D Child Dev; 2013; 84(4):1137-44. PubMed ID: 23432603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the intricacies involved in the study of similarity judgments: comment on Ritov, Gati, and Tversky. Keren G J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Mar; 119(1):42-3; discussion 44. PubMed ID: 2141062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The consistency of the subjective concept of randomness. Yu RQ; Gunn J; Osherson D; Zhao J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):906-916. PubMed ID: 28300007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Figural characteristics associated with random appearance of dot patterns. Tone T Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Oct; 79(2):849-50. PubMed ID: 7870510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. Bonanno GA; Stillings NA Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detectability as a function of spatial location: effects of selective attention. Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 2297434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events. Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. Malmberg KJ; Holden JE; Shiffren RM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 14979807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consolidation of statistical information of multiple objects in working memory. Baijal S; Srinivasan N Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1733-41. PubMed ID: 21607816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings. Proctor RW; Healy AF Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):180-94. PubMed ID: 3627939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Now you see it, now you don't: repetition blindness for nonwords. Morris AL; Still ML J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):146-66. PubMed ID: 18194060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention, awareness of contingencies, and control in spatial localization: a qualitative difference approach. Vaquero JM; Fiacconi C; Milliken B J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1342-57. PubMed ID: 21038991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]