BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35853177)

  • 1. Patient-Related Functional Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Rectal Surgery Compared With a Laparoscopic Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Waters PS; McCormick JJ; Warrier SK; Heriot A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Oct; 65(10):1191-1204. PubMed ID: 35853177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kowalewski KF; Seifert L; Ali S; Schmidt MW; Seide S; Haney C; Tapking C; Shamiyeh A; Kulu Y; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 32025924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operative and oncological outcomes after robotic rectal resection compared with laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Rahme J; Waters PS; Warrier SK; Heriot A
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):510-521. PubMed ID: 36214098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
    Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qiu H; Yu D; Ye S; Shan R; Ai J; Shi J
    Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():225-230. PubMed ID: 32251720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations.
    Luca F; Craigg DK; Senthil M; Selleck MJ; Babcock BD; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA
    Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 30120743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Broholm M; Pommergaard HC; Gögenür I
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 May; 17(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 25515638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery.
    Kim HJ; Choi GS; Park JS; Park SY; Yang CS; Lee HJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 May; 20(5):O103-O113. PubMed ID: 29460997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Huang YJ; Kang YN; Huang YM; Wu AT; Wang W; Wei PL
    Asian J Surg; 2019 Jun; 42(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 30609955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term surgical outcomes and patient quality of life between robotic and laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
    Kamali D; Reddy A; Imam S; Omar K; Jha A; Jha M
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 Nov; 99(8):607-613. PubMed ID: 29022779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis.
    Fleming CA; Cullinane C; Lynch N; Killeen S; Coffey JC; Peirce CB
    Br J Surg; 2021 Mar; 108(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 33711141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in male urogenital function preservation, a meta-analysis.
    Tang X; Wang Z; Wu X; Yang M; Wang D
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):196. PubMed ID: 30285780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient quality of life and short-term surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic anterior resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
    Kamali D; Omar K; Imam SZ; Jha A; Reddy A; Jha M
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 May; 21(5):355-361. PubMed ID: 28560480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.
    Ilic D; Evans SM; Allan CA; Jung JH; Murphy D; Frydenberg M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD009625. PubMed ID: 28895658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.
    Phan K; Kahlaee HR; Kim SH; Toh JWT
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Mar; 23(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30623315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.