BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35854033)

  • 21. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: safety, perioperative morbidity and short-term oncological outcome-a single institution experience.
    Sayed AI; Goel S; Aggarwal A; Singh S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 34228249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
    Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Berlth F; Poplawski A; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Müller-Stich BP; Ruurda JP; Schiesser M; Schneider PM; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1060. PubMed ID: 34565343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
    Müller DT; Brunner S; Straatman J; Babic B; Eckhoff JA; Reisewitz A; Storms C; Schiffmann LM; Schmidt T; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7305-7316. PubMed ID: 37580580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
    de Groot EM; van der Horst S; Kingma BF; Goense L; van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Epidural analgesia after minimally invasive esophagectomy: efficacy and complication profile.
    Kingma BF; Visser E; Marsman M; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 30561659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
    Rebecchi F; Ugliono E; Allaix ME; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2023 Feb; 75(2):367-372. PubMed ID: 35953621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robot-assisted transthoracic hybrid esophagectomy versus open and laparoscopic hybrid esophagectomy: propensity score matched analysis of short-term outcome.
    Reinstaller T; Adolf D; Lorenz E; Croner RS; Benedix F
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3357-3365. PubMed ID: 36066670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy: Current Situation and Future Perspectives.
    Watanabe M; Kuriyama K; Terayama M; Okamura A; Kanamori J; Imamura Y
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 29(4):168-176. PubMed ID: 37225478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
    Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical robotics for esophageal cancer.
    Grimminger PP; van der Horst S; Ruurda JP; van Det M; Morel P; van Hillegersberg R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Dec; 1434(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 29741233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: unclear benefits compared to traditional transhiatal esophagectomy.
    Keeney-Bonthrone TP; Abbott KL; Haley C; Karmakar M; Hawes AM; Chang AC; Lin J; Lynch WR; Carrott PW; Lagisetty KH; Orringer MB; Reddy RM
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):883-891. PubMed ID: 34581956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Drainless robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy-randomized controlled trial (RESPECT).
    Müssle B; Kirchberg J; Buck N; Radulova-Mauersberger O; Stange D; Richter T; Müller-Stich B; Klotz R; Larmann J; Korn S; Klimova A; Grählert X; Trips E; Weitz J; Welsch T
    Trials; 2023 May; 24(1):303. PubMed ID: 37127683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis.
    Harbison GJ; Vossler JD; Yim NH; Murayama KM
    Am J Surg; 2019 Dec; 218(6):1223-1228. PubMed ID: 31500797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.