These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35854082)

  • 1. Should the Revised Uniform Determination of Death Act Address Objections to the Use of Neurologic Criteria to Declare Death?
    Lewis A
    Neurocrit Care; 2022 Oct; 37(2):377-385. PubMed ID: 35854082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Being Revised.
    Lewis A
    Neurocrit Care; 2022 Apr; 36(2):335-338. PubMed ID: 35102538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United States: The Case for Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act.
    Lewis A; Bonnie RJ; Pope T; Epstein LG; Greer DM; Kirschen MP; Rubin M; Russell JA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2019 Dec; 47(4_suppl):9-24. PubMed ID: 31955689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal Objections to Use of Neurologic Criteria to Declare Death in the United States: 1968 to 2017.
    Lewis A; Scheyer O
    Chest; 2019 Jun; 155(6):1234-1245. PubMed ID: 30935891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act to Align the Law With Practice Through Neurorespiratory Criteria.
    Omelianchuk A; Bernat J; Caplan A; Greer D; Lazaridis C; Lewis A; Pope T; Ross LF; Magnus D
    Neurology; 2022 Mar; 98(13):532-536. PubMed ID: 35078943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician Power to Declare Death by Neurologic Criteria Threatened.
    Lewis A; Pope TM
    Neurocrit Care; 2017 Jun; 26(3):446-449. PubMed ID: 28078616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?
    Nguyen D
    Linacre Q; 2020 Aug; 87(3):317-333. PubMed ID: 32699442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An interdisciplinary response to contemporary concerns about brain death determination.
    Lewis A; Bernat JL; Blosser S; Bonnie RJ; Epstein LG; Hutchins J; Kirschen MP; Rubin M; Russell JA; Sattin JA; Wijdicks EFM; Greer DM
    Neurology; 2018 Feb; 90(9):423-426. PubMed ID: 29386276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Overview of Ethical Issues Raised by Medicolegal Challenges to Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United Kingdom and a Comparison to Management of These Challenges in the USA.
    Lewis A
    Am J Bioeth; 2024 Jan; 24(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 36634197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency of use of the religious exemption in New Jersey cases of determination of brain death.
    Son RG; Setta SM
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 30107797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Building a Fence Around Brain Death: The Shielded-Brain Formulation.
    Gelb DJ
    Neurology; 2021 Oct; 97(16):780-784. PubMed ID: 34413182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Taxonomy of Objections to Brain Death Determination.
    Morrison WE; Kirschen MP
    Neurocrit Care; 2022 Oct; 37(2):369-371. PubMed ID: 35999409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current Practice Diagnosing Brain Death Is Not Consistent With Legal Statutes Requiring the Absence of All Brain Function.
    Nair-Collins M; Miller FG
    J Intensive Care Med; 2022 Feb; 37(2):153-156. PubMed ID: 32627637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical and Legal Concerns With Nevada's Brain Death Amendments.
    Yanke G; Rady MY; Verheijde JL
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun; 15(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 29667151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statement in Support of Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act and in Opposition to a Proposed Revision.
    Shewmon DA
    J Med Philos; 2021 May; ():. PubMed ID: 33987668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain death. I. A status report of medical and ethical considerations.
    Veith FJ; Fein JM; Tendler MD; Veatch RM; Kleiman MA; Kalkines G
    JAMA; 1977 Oct; 238(15):1651-5. PubMed ID: 578252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contentious Ethical and Legal Aspects of Determination of Brain Death.
    Lewis A
    Semin Neurol; 2018 Oct; 38(5):576-582. PubMed ID: 30321897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of current controversies in determining death by neurologic criteria in children.
    Virupakshaiah A; Ichord R; Topjian AA; Kirschen MP
    Curr Opin Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 32(6):759-764. PubMed ID: 33009123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organ Support After Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pediatric Patients.
    Lewis A; Adams N; Chopra A; Kirschen MP
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Sep; 45(9):e916-e924. PubMed ID: 28471816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current controversies in brain death determination.
    Lewis A; Greer D
    Nat Rev Neurol; 2017 Aug; 13(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 28548107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.