BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3585503)

  • 1. Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.
    Nilas L; Pødenphant J; Riis BJ; Gotfredsen A; Christiansen C
    J Nucl Med; 1987 Jun; 28(6):960-5. PubMed ID: 3585503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.
    Riggs BL; Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Mazess RB; Offord KP; Melton LJ
    J Clin Invest; 1981 Feb; 67(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 7462421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic validity of local and total bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.
    Nilas L; Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1986 Dec; 25(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 3652471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative bone density measurements in healthy women and women with osteoporosis].
    Reinbold WD; Genant HK; Dinkel E
    Radiologe; 1988 Apr; 28(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 3289080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model for involutional bone loss.
    Aloia JF; Vaswani A; Ellis K; Yuen K; Cohn SH
    J Lab Clin Med; 1985 Dec; 106(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 4067377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.
    Mazess RB; Peppler WW; Chesney RW; Lange TA; Lindgren U; Smith E
    J Nucl Med; 1984 Mar; 25(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 6699720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a place for forearm osteodensitometry in clinical screening studies?
    Robinson B; Wagstaffe C; Roche J; Clifton-Bligh P; Posen S
    Med J Aust; 1987 Mar; 146(6):297-300. PubMed ID: 3493421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone density in osteopenic women: a modified distal radius density measurement procedure to develop an "at risk" value for use in screening women.
    Grubb SA; Jacobson PC; Awbrey BJ; McCartney WH; Vincent LM; Talmage RV
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 6527157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemiology of postmenopausal spinal and long bone fractures. A unifying approach to postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    Jensen GF; Christiansen C; Boesen J; Hegedüs V; Transbøl I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Jun; (166):75-81. PubMed ID: 7083689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bone density measurements from different skeletal sites.
    Seldin DW; Esser PD; Alderson PO
    J Nucl Med; 1988 Feb; 29(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 3346733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry.
    Ross PD; Wasnich RD; Vogel JM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1988 Feb; 3(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 3213600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine, II. correlation between forearm BMC and lumbar spine BMC.
    Krølner B; Pors Nielsen S; Lund B; Lund B; Sørensen OH; Uhrenholdt A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1980; 40(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 7466295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral: a comparison of dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Sambrook PN; Bartlett C; Evans R; Hesp R; Katz D; Reeve J
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):621-4. PubMed ID: 4016495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures.
    Christiansen C; Riis B; Nilas L
    Scott Med J; 1986 Jul; 31(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 3798089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of bone mass measurements by photon absorptiometry.
    Hassager C; Christiansen C
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):23-6. PubMed ID: 2517696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis.
    Seeman E; Hopper JL; Bach LA; Cooper ME; Parkinson E; McKay J; Jerums G
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(9):554-8. PubMed ID: 2915666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.
    Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-photon bone densitometry in normal Australian women: a cross-sectional study.
    Pocock NA; Eberl S; Eisman JA; Yeates MG; Sambrook PN; Freund J; Duncan A
    Med J Aust; 1987 Mar; 146(6):293-7. PubMed ID: 3493420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine.
    von Wowern N; Storm TL; Olgaard K
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1988 Mar; 42(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 3130164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone mass and bone diminution of the axial and peripheral skeleton in normal and osteoporotic Austrian females.
    Resch H; Pietschmann P; Bernecker P; Krexner E; Willvonseder R
    Acta Med Austriaca; 1991; 18(5):117-20. PubMed ID: 1796723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.