These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3585503)

  • 1. Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.
    Nilas L; Pødenphant J; Riis BJ; Gotfredsen A; Christiansen C
    J Nucl Med; 1987 Jun; 28(6):960-5. PubMed ID: 3585503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.
    Riggs BL; Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Mazess RB; Offord KP; Melton LJ
    J Clin Invest; 1981 Feb; 67(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 7462421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic validity of local and total bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.
    Nilas L; Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1986 Dec; 25(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 3652471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative bone density measurements in healthy women and women with osteoporosis].
    Reinbold WD; Genant HK; Dinkel E
    Radiologe; 1988 Apr; 28(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 3289080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model for involutional bone loss.
    Aloia JF; Vaswani A; Ellis K; Yuen K; Cohn SH
    J Lab Clin Med; 1985 Dec; 106(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 4067377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.
    Mazess RB; Peppler WW; Chesney RW; Lange TA; Lindgren U; Smith E
    J Nucl Med; 1984 Mar; 25(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 6699720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a place for forearm osteodensitometry in clinical screening studies?
    Robinson B; Wagstaffe C; Roche J; Clifton-Bligh P; Posen S
    Med J Aust; 1987 Mar; 146(6):297-300. PubMed ID: 3493421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone density in osteopenic women: a modified distal radius density measurement procedure to develop an "at risk" value for use in screening women.
    Grubb SA; Jacobson PC; Awbrey BJ; McCartney WH; Vincent LM; Talmage RV
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 6527157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemiology of postmenopausal spinal and long bone fractures. A unifying approach to postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    Jensen GF; Christiansen C; Boesen J; Hegedüs V; Transbøl I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Jun; (166):75-81. PubMed ID: 7083689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bone density measurements from different skeletal sites.
    Seldin DW; Esser PD; Alderson PO
    J Nucl Med; 1988 Feb; 29(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 3346733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry.
    Ross PD; Wasnich RD; Vogel JM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1988 Feb; 3(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 3213600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine, II. correlation between forearm BMC and lumbar spine BMC.
    Krølner B; Pors Nielsen S; Lund B; Lund B; Sørensen OH; Uhrenholdt A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1980; 40(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 7466295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral: a comparison of dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Sambrook PN; Bartlett C; Evans R; Hesp R; Katz D; Reeve J
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):621-4. PubMed ID: 4016495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures.
    Christiansen C; Riis B; Nilas L
    Scott Med J; 1986 Jul; 31(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 3798089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of bone mass measurements by photon absorptiometry.
    Hassager C; Christiansen C
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):23-6. PubMed ID: 2517696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis.
    Seeman E; Hopper JL; Bach LA; Cooper ME; Parkinson E; McKay J; Jerums G
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(9):554-8. PubMed ID: 2915666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.
    Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-photon bone densitometry in normal Australian women: a cross-sectional study.
    Pocock NA; Eberl S; Eisman JA; Yeates MG; Sambrook PN; Freund J; Duncan A
    Med J Aust; 1987 Mar; 146(6):293-7. PubMed ID: 3493420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine.
    von Wowern N; Storm TL; Olgaard K
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1988 Mar; 42(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 3130164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone mass and bone diminution of the axial and peripheral skeleton in normal and osteoporotic Austrian females.
    Resch H; Pietschmann P; Bernecker P; Krexner E; Willvonseder R
    Acta Med Austriaca; 1991; 18(5):117-20. PubMed ID: 1796723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.