149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35855317)
1. Effect of abutment neck taper and cement types on the amount of remnant cement in cement-retained implant restorations: an
Park YH; Kim KA; Lee JJ; Kwon TM; Seo JM
J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 14(3):162-172. PubMed ID: 35855317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Luting Materials and Methods and the Restoration Surface on the Amount of Cement Remnants in Implant Restorations.
Lee JH; Yang SE; Lee J; Lee SY
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Aug; 45(4):301-307. PubMed ID: 31008680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions.
Sancho-Puchades M; Crameri D; Özcan M; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 28407306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments.
Grzech-Leśniak K; Bencharit S; Dalal N; Mroczka K; Deeb JG
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):672-676. PubMed ID: 31125150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention.
Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the Best Available Luting Agent for Implant Prosthesis?
Almehmadi N; Kutkut A; Al-Sabbagh M
Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):531-545. PubMed ID: 31097143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
Canullo L; Cocchetto R; Marinotti F; Oltra DP; Diago MP; Loi I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 25846254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cementing an Implant Crown: A Novel Measurement System Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach.
Wadhwani C; Goodwin S; Chung KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 25196982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing effectiveness of rubber dam and gingival displacement cord with copy abutment in reducing residual cement in cement-retained implant crowns: A crossover RCT.
Andrijauskas P; Zukauskas S; Alkimavicius J; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):549-558. PubMed ID: 33595848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study.
Jugdev J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lynch E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 25032757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
