These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35855321)

  • 41. Zirconia crowns manufactured using digital light processing: Effects of printing angle and layer thickness on the accuracy.
    Mou Z; Zhong J; Wang F; Alhotan A; Zhu P; Li P; Huang J
    J Dent; 2024 Oct; ():105359. PubMed ID: 39362298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of print orientation on the intaglio surface accuracy (trueness and precision) of tilting stereolithography definitive resin-ceramic crowns.
    Revilla-León M; Supaphakorn A; Barmak AB; Rutkunas V; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37105822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of Milling Protocols on Trueness and Precision of Ceramic Crowns.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al-Rashdan RB; Al-Rashdan BA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 32856358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
    Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns.
    Lameira DP; Buarque e Silva WA; Andrade e Silva F; De Souza GM
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():418641. PubMed ID: 26576423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly.
    Zhang F; Spies BC; Vleugels J; Reveron H; Wesemann C; Müller WD; van Meerbeek B; Chevalier J
    Dent Mater; 2019 Dec; 35(12):1776-1790. PubMed ID: 31727445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Two-body wear and fracture behaviour of an experimental paediatric composite crown in comparison to zirconia and stainless steel crowns dependent on the cementation mode.
    Kessler A; Kapor S; Erdelt K; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Syrek A; Güth JF; Kühnisch J
    Dent Mater; 2021 Feb; 37(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 33298317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.
    Altamimi AM; Tripodakis AP; Eliades G; Hirayama H
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 24757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness.
    Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness.
    Nakamura K; Harada A; Inagaki R; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Milleding P; Örtengren U
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 25635734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study.
    Lerner H; Nagy K; Pranno N; Zarone F; Admakin O; Mangano F
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103792. PubMed ID: 34481929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fracture resistance and failure mode of layered translucent zirconia with different crown designs.
    Al-Qaysi SH; Saleh ARM; El-Damanhoury HM
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Feb; 41(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 34483200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical assessment of enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Stober T; Bermejo JL; Schwindling FS; Schmitter M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 43(8):621-9. PubMed ID: 27198539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
    Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies.
    Son K; Lee JH; Lee KB
    Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 34442120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Wear Of Enamel Antagonist To Monolithic Zirconia And Metal-Ceramic Crowns.
    Deval P; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Chauhan M; Jaiswal N; Tiwari DK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):744–751. PubMed ID: 33750998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.
    Park JH; Park S; Lee K; Yun KD; Lim HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 24199603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use.
    Stober T; Bermejo JL; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 41(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 24447258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Occlusal Thickness and Cement-Type Effects on Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
    Bulut AC; Atsü SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 34115062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of Surface Treatment and Cement on Fracture Load of Traditional Zirconia (3Y), Translucent Zirconia (5Y), and Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
    Lawson NC; Jurado CA; Huang CT; Morris GP; Burgess JO; Liu PR; Kinderknecht KE; Lin CP; Givan DA
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):659-665. PubMed ID: 31145492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.