These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35856237)
21. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes. Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations]. Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in minimally invasive surgery of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scutiero G; Vizzielli G; Taliento C; Bernardi G; Martinello R; Cianci S; Riemma G; Scambia G; Greco P Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Oct; 48(10):2112-2118. PubMed ID: 35725683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Galaal K; Bryant A; Fisher AD; Al-Khaduri M; Kew F; Lopes AD Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD006655. PubMed ID: 22972096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer. Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review. Nevis IF; Vali B; Higgins C; Dhalla I; Urbach D; Bernardini MQ J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27424111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics. Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer. Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers. Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Prospective, Comparative Study for the Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Staging of Endometrial Cancer. Cohn DE; Castellon-Larios K; Huffman L; Salani R; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ; O'Malley DM; Backes FJ; Eisenhauer EL; Abdel-Rasoul M; Puente EG; Bergese SD J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 26776677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer. Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]