149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35859669)
1. Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France).
Audiger C; Bovagnet T; Bardes J; Abihsera G; Nicolet J; Deghaye M; Bochaton A; Menvielle G
Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1604562. PubMed ID: 35859669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys.
Kelly DM; Estaquio C; Léon C; Arwidson P; Nabi H
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e016941. PubMed ID: 29247085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with participation in the organized cervical cancer screening program in the greater Paris area (France): An analysis among more than 200,000 women.
Audiger C; Bovagnet T; Deghaye M; Kaufmanis A; Pelisson C; Bochaton A; Menvielle G
Prev Med; 2021 Dec; 153():106831. PubMed ID: 34624389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corrigendum: Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France).
Audiger C; Bovagnet T; Bardes J; Abihsera G; Nicolet J; Deghaye M; Bochaton A; Menvielle G
Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1605236. PubMed ID: 36275435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nationally quasi-experimental study to assess the impact of partial organized breast and cervical cancer screening programme on participation and inequalities.
Bao H; Wang L; Brown M; Zhang M; Hunt K; Di J; Zhao Z; Cong S; Fan J; Fang L; Wang L
BMC Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(1):1191. PubMed ID: 33276761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.
Raginel T; Grandazzi G; Launoy G; Trocmé M; Christophe V; Berchi C; Guittet L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jul; 20(1):693. PubMed ID: 32718319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inequalities in cervical cancer screening for women with or without a regular consulting in primary care for gynaecological health, in Paris, France.
Grillo F; Vallée J; Chauvin P
Prev Med; 2012; 54(3-4):259-65. PubMed ID: 22296836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer screening programs and their context-dependent effect on inequalities in screening uptake: a dynamic interplay between public health policy and welfare state redistribution.
De Prez V; Jolidon V; Willems B; Cullati S; Burton-Jeangros C; Bracke P
Int J Equity Health; 2021 Sep; 20(1):211. PubMed ID: 34560888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of late cervical cancer screening in the Paris region according to social deprivation and medical densities in daily visited neighborhoods.
Traoré M; Vallée J; Chauvin P
Int J Health Geogr; 2020 May; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 32466794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia.
Willems B; Bracke P
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Dec; 18(1):943. PubMed ID: 30514273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are immigrants and nationals born to immigrants at higher risk for delayed or no lifetime breast and cervical cancer screening? The results from a population-based survey in Paris metropolitan area in 2010.
Rondet C; Lapostolle A; Soler M; Grillo F; Parizot I; Chauvin P
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87046. PubMed ID: 24466323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introduction of an organised programme and social inequalities in mammography screening: A 22-year population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland.
Sandoval JL; Theler JM; Cullati S; Bouchardy C; Manor O; Gaspoz JM; Guessous I
Prev Med; 2017 Oct; 103():49-55. PubMed ID: 28778819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer screening among homeless women in the Greater Paris Area (France): results of the ENFAMS survey.
Vuillermoz C; Vandentorren S; Roze M; Rondet C; Chauvin P
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2017 May; 26(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 26895575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do social inequalities in cervical cancer screening persist among patients who use primary care? The Paris Prevention in General Practice survey.
Rigal L; Saurel-Cubizolles MJ; Falcoff H; Bouyer J; Ringa V
Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 21726576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.
Maj C; Poncet L; Panjo H; Gautier A; Chauvin P; Menvielle G; Cadot E; Ringa V; Rigal L
BMC Fam Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 31416425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: The case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France).
Vallée J; Cadot E; Grillo F; Parizot I; Chauvin P
Health Place; 2010 Sep; 16(5):838-52. PubMed ID: 20451439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical screening coverage in England: are we closing the gap?
Douglas E; Waller J; Duffy SW; Wardle J
J Med Screen; 2016 Jun; 23(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 26377810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social inequalities in participation in cancer screening: does the mode of data collection matter? The CONSTANCES cohort.
Aranda E; Franck JE; Ringa V; Sassenou J; Coeuret-Pellicer M; Rigal L; Menvielle G
Eur J Public Health; 2021 Jul; 31(3):602-608. PubMed ID: 34233352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Korea, 2005-2015.
Choi E; Lee YY; Suh M; Lee EY; Mai TTX; Ki M; Oh JK; Cho H; Park B; Jun JK; Kim Y; Choi KS
Yonsei Med J; 2018 Nov; 59(9):1026-1033. PubMed ID: 30328316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.
Nowakowski A; Cybulski M; Śliwczyński A; Chil A; Teter Z; Seroczyński P; Arbyn M; Anttila A
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():279. PubMed ID: 25879466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
