These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35859974)

  • 1. Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: An Analysis of Readability and Quality of Web-Based information.
    Hidayat Y; Rajkoomar AG; Qadeer MA; D'Souza LG
    Cureus; 2022 Jun; 14(6):e26029. PubMed ID: 35859974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
    Raja H; Patel K
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
    Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.
    Murphy B; Irwin S; Condon F; Kennedy C
    Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e366-e370. PubMed ID: 35034835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal Humerus Fracture: An Evaluation of the Readability and Value of Web-Based Knowledge.
    Elshohna M; Hidayat Y; Karkuri A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27957. PubMed ID: 36120225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19.
    Wrigley Kelly NE; Murray KE; McCarthy C; O'Shea DB
    Health Technol (Berl); 2021; 11(5):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 34189011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability and Quality of Online Information on Sickle Cell Retinopathy for Patients.
    Gbedemah ZEE; Fuseini MN; Fordjuor SKEJ; Baisie-Nkrumah EJ; Beecham REM; Amissah-Arthur KN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 259():45-52. PubMed ID: 37918780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
    Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
    Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
    Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
    Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.