170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35861102)
1. Early evaluation of a next-generation surgical system in robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A prospective clinical cohort study.
Borse M; Godbole G; Kelkar D; Bahulikar M; Dinneen E; Slack M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Sep; 101(9):978-986. PubMed ID: 35861102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interim safety analysis of the first-in-human clinical trial of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery.
Kelkar D; Borse MA; Godbole GP; Kurlekar U; Slack M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5193-5202. PubMed ID: 32989548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Early Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the Versius Surgical System in Robot-Assisted Cholecystectomy.
Kelkar DS; Kurlekar U; Stevens L; Wagholikar GD; Slack M
Ann Surg; 2023 Jan; 277(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 35170538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
Lowenstein L; Mor O; Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Boulus S; Weiner Z; Baekelandt J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 33144242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safe Implementation of a Next-Generation Surgical Robot: First Analysis of 2,083 Cases in the Versius Surgical Registry.
Soumpasis I; Nashef S; Dunning J; Moran P; Slack M
Ann Surg; 2023 Oct; 278(4):e903-e910. PubMed ID: 37036097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preclinical Evaluation of the Versius Surgical System, a New Robot-assisted Surgical Device for Use in Minimal Access Renal and Prostate Surgery.
Thomas BC; Slack M; Hussain M; Barber N; Pradhan A; Dinneen E; Stewart GD
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):444-452. PubMed ID: 32169362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access general and colorectal procedures.
Morton J; Hardwick RH; Tilney HS; Gudgeon AM; Jah A; Stevens L; Marecik S; Slack M
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2169-2177. PubMed ID: 32405893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical Complications and Hospital Costs in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database.
Andiman SE; Bui AH; Ascher-Walsh C; Wright JD; Xu X
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 May; 28(5):e142-e148. PubMed ID: 35113048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Deimling TA; Eldridge JL; Riley KA; Kunselman AR; Harkins GJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 28099699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.
Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uccella S; Zorzato PC; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):710-720. PubMed ID: 33348012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Solo surgery--early results of robot-assisted three-dimensional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Tuschy B; Berlit S; Brade J; Sütterlin M; Hornemann A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Aug; 23(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 24564722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
