147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35861936)
1. Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter single-arm confirmatory trial: JCOG0906.
Nozaki M; Kagami Y; Takahashi M; Machida R; Sekino Y; Shibata T; Ito Y; Nishimura Y; Teshima T; Ushijima H; Nagata Y; Matsumoto Y; Akimoto T; Takahashi K; Murayama S; Uno T; Tsujino K; Hamamoto Y; Nakagawa K; Kodaira T; Hiraoka M;
Breast Cancer; 2022 Nov; 29(6):1042-1049. PubMed ID: 35861936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment.
Cardoso MJ; Cardoso J; Amaral N; Azevedo I; Barreau L; Bernardo M; Christie D; Costa S; Fitzal F; Fougo JL; Johansen J; Macmillan D; Mano MP; Regolo L; Rosa J; Teixeira L; Vrieling C
Breast; 2007 Oct; 16(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 17606373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposal for a gold standard for cosmetic evaluation after breast conserving therapy: Results from the St George and Wollongong Breast Boost trial.
Merie R; Browne L; Cardoso JS; Cardoso MJ; Chin Y; Clark C; Graham P; Szwajcer A; Hau E
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Dec; 61(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 28834326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is face-only photographic view enough for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment?
Cardoso MJ; Magalhães A; Almeida T; Costa S; Vrieling C; Christie D; Johansen J; Cardoso JS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 112(3):565-8. PubMed ID: 18204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial.
Cardoso MJ; Vrieling C; Cardoso JS; Oliveira HP; Williams NR; Dixon JM; ;
Breast; 2018 Oct; 41():19-24. PubMed ID: 29940498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective Measurement of Cosmetic Outcomes of Breast Conserving Therapy Using BCCT.core.
Yu T; Eom KY; Jang NY; Kim KS; Koo TR; Kwon J; Kim BH; Kang E; Kim SW; Kim JS; Kim IA
Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 48(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 26130667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing two objective methods for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment.
Cardoso MJ; Cardoso JS; Wild T; Krois W; Fitzal F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 18777134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of cosmetic outcome following breast-conserving therapy in trials: panel versus digitalized analysis and the role of PROMs.
Lagendijk M; Vos EL; Nieboer D; Verhoef C; Corten EML; Koppert LB
Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 29316049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation.
Heil J; Carolus A; Dahlkamp J; Golatta M; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Blumenstein M; Rauch G; Sohn C
Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 21852135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of the BCCT.core software in evaluation of breast cosmesis - A systematic review.
Trakis S; Lord H; Graham P; Fernandez R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Oct; 65(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 33973358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cosmetic Outcome Assessment following Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Comparison between BCCT.core Software and Panel Evaluation.
Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Jacobs GJ; Zonderhuis B; Bouman MB; Buncamper ME; Niessen FB; Winters HA; Terwee C; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Int J Breast Cancer; 2014; 2014():716860. PubMed ID: 25328712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Final analysis of a Multicenter Single-Arm Confirmatory Trial of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in Japan: JCOG0906.
Nozaki M; Kagami Y; Machida R; Nakamura K; Ito Y; Nishimura Y; Teshima T; Saito Y; Nagata Y; Matsumoto Y; Akimoto T; Hiraoka M;
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2021 May; 51(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 33728450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The breast cancer conservative treatment. Cosmetic results - BCCT.core - Software for objective assessment of esthetic outcome in breast cancer conservative treatment: A narrative review.
Cardoso MJ; Cardoso JS; Oliveira HP; Gouveia P
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():154-9. PubMed ID: 26707372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™.
Dahlbäck C; Ullmark JH; Rehn M; Ringberg A; Manjer J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):679-687. PubMed ID: 28536951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of reconstructive techniques in breast cancer using BCCT. core software.
Kurt S; İlgün AS; Özkurt E; Soybir G; Alço G; Ünal Ç; Çelebi FE; Duymaz T; Tapan TK; Ak N; Ordu Ç; Özmen V
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 38519998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy.
Racz JM; Hong NL; Latosinsky S
Breast J; 2015; 21(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 25940058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT).
Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Negenborn VL; Kolk RH; Lopes Cardozo AM; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; van der Veen H; Rijna H; Taets van Amerongen AH; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):649-657. PubMed ID: 27916314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiotherapy breast boost with reduced whole-breast dose is associated with improved cosmesis: the results of a comprehensive assessment from the St. George and Wollongong randomized breast boost trial.
Hau E; Browne LH; Khanna S; Cail S; Cert G; Chin Y; Clark C; Inder S; Szwajcer A; Graham PH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):682-9. PubMed ID: 21255943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery assessed by three evaluation modalities in relation to health-related quality of life.
Dahlbäck C; Ringberg A; Manjer J
Br J Surg; 2019 Jan; 106(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 30160774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Vrieling C; Collette L; Bartelink E; Borger JH; Brenninkmeyer SJ; Horiot JC; Pierart M; Poortmans PM; Struikmans H; Van der Schueren E; Van Dongen JA; Van Limbergen E; Bartelink H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 10524421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
