These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35863456)

  • 1. The impact of insurance mandates on donor oocyte utilization: an analysis of 39,338 donor oocyte cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    George JS; Lee MS; Ashby RK; Goldman R; Ginsburg ES; Lanes A; Srouji SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 227(6):877.e1-877.e11. PubMed ID: 35863456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of comprehensive state insurance mandates on in vitro fertilization utilization, embryo transfer practices, and outcomes in the United States.
    Peipert BJ; Chung EH; Harris BS; Jain T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):64.e1-64.e8. PubMed ID: 35283088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of state insurance coverage mandates with assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation.
    Lee JC; DeSantis CE; Yartel AK; Kissin DM; Kawwass JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 228(3):315.e1-315.e14. PubMed ID: 36368429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of state insurance mandates on racial/ethnic disparities in the utilization and outcomes of donor oocyte-assisted reproductive technologies.
    Liao C; Kotlyar AM; Seifer DB
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Jul; 120(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 36871857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†.
    Chambers GM; Dyer S; Zegers-Hochschild F; de Mouzon J; Ishihara O; Banker M; Mansour R; Kupka MS; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2921-2934. PubMed ID: 34601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes.
    Gerkowicz SA; Crawford SB; Hipp HS; Boulet SL; Kissin DM; Kawwass JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):421.e1-421.e10. PubMed ID: 29291411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frozen autologous and donor oocytes are associated with differences in clinical and neonatal outcomes compared with fresh oocytes: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System Analysis.
    Burks CA; Purdue-Smithe A; DeVilbiss E; Mumford S; Weinerman R
    F S Rep; 2024 Mar; 5(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 38524209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicted probabilities of live birth following assisted reproductive technology using United States national surveillance data from 2016 to 2018.
    Gaskins AJ; Zhang Y; Chang J; Kissin DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5):557.e1-557.e10. PubMed ID: 36702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.
    Whynott RM; Summers KM; Ball GD; Van Voorhis BJ; Sparks A
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 35216830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
    Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
    JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of donor and recipient race on outcomes of assisted reproduction.
    Liu Y; Hipp HS; Nagy ZP; Capelouto SM; Shapiro DB; Spencer JB; Gaskins AJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):374.e1-374.e12. PubMed ID: 32931770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ectopic pregnancy rate increases with the number of retrieved oocytes in autologous in vitro fertilization with non-tubal infertility but not donor/recipient cycles: an analysis of 109,140 clinical pregnancies from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Provost MP; Yeh JS; Steward RG; Eaton JL; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Oct; 104(4):873-878. PubMed ID: 26171996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birth outcomes are superior after transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos for donor oocyte recipients.
    Roeca C; Johnson RL; Truong T; Carlson NE; Polotsky AJ
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2850-2859. PubMed ID: 33190157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2012†.
    de Mouzon J; Chambers GM; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Banker M; Dyer S; Kupka M; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1900-1913. PubMed ID: 32699900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
    Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adherence to embryo transfer guidelines in favorable-prognosis patients aged less than 35 years using autologous oocytes and in recipients using donor oocytes: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study.
    Gingold JA; Fazzari M; Gerber R; Kappy M; Goodman M; Lieman H; Pollack S; Singh M; Jindal S
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):548-559. PubMed ID: 35058041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.