150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35864011)
1. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Alotaibi AM; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Park IJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 28357501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Bong JW; Seo JH; Kim CW; Park SH; Kim J
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2082-2094. PubMed ID: 31332563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sphincter-saving surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment with propensity score analysis.
Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2623-2630. PubMed ID: 34008108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complete intersphincteric longitudinal muscle excision May Be key to reducing local recurrence during intersphincteric resection.
Kim JC; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 33642088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of robot-assisted curative resection for rare anorectal tumours on the basis of individualised treatment.
Kim JC; Kim J; Jung J; Kim CW; Yoon YS; Park IJ
Int J Med Robot; 2022 Apr; 18(2):e2348. PubMed ID: 34741383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Park IJ; Yoon YS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26141090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Efficacy of Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
He Z; Peng B; Chen W; Zhu J; Chen B; Li G; Cao J; Li W
Am Surg; 2023 Apr; 89(4):1009-1017. PubMed ID: 34783266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of tumor distance from anal verge and types of operations on survival outcomes for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy].
Xiao Y; Wu B; Qiu H; Xiong G; Lin G; Zhong G; Hu K; Pan W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 94(22):1705-9. PubMed ID: 25151899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: the risk is functional rather than oncological. A 25-year experience from Bordeaux.
Denost Q; Moreau JB; Vendrely V; Celerier B; Rullier A; Assenat V; Rullier E
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 32649005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Meta-analysis comparing long-term outcomes of intersphincteric resection versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].
Cao K; Jin Y; Shi BH; Shi XY; Wang ZJ; Han JG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 26(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 37583014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y; Shida D; Ochiai H; Mazaki J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 May; 32(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 28091845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Chamlou R; Parc Y; Simon T; Bennis M; Dehni N; Parc R; Tiret E
Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):916-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 18043092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intersphincteric Resection Versus Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Peng B; Lu J; Wu Z; Li G; Wei F; Cao J; Li W
Surg Innov; 2020 Aug; 27(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 32390544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Transanal total mesorectal excision combined with intersphincteric resection has similar long-term oncological outcomes to laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Liu ZH; Zeng ZW; Jie HQ; Huang L; Luo SL; Liang WF; Zhang XW; Kang L
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2022; 10():goac026. PubMed ID: 35711716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
