BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35866838)

  • 1. Health economic evaluation of an mRNA high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) assay versus a DNA HR-HPV assay for the proposed French cervical screening programme.
    Dombrowski CA; Weston GM; Descamps PP; Izopet PJ; Adams EJ; Adams E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(29):e29530. PubMed ID: 35866838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the Aptima mRNA high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) assay compared to a DNA HR-HPV assay in the English cervical screening programme: a decision tree model based economic evaluation.
    Weston G; Dombrowski C; Harvey MJ; Iftner T; Kyrgiou M; Founta C; Adams EJ
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e031303. PubMed ID: 32152154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
    Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
    Felix JC; Lacey MJ; Miller JD; Lenhart GM; Spitzer M; Kulkarni R
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jun; 25(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 27023044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An economic evaluation of two cervical screening algorithms in Belgium: HR-HPV primary compared to HR-HPV and liquid-based cytology co-testing.
    Dombrowski C; Bourgain C; Ma Y; Meiwald A; Pinsent A; Weynand B; Turner KME; Huntington S; Adams EJ; Bogers J; Croes R; Sahebali S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 33(3):262-270. PubMed ID: 37933867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
    Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HPV E6/E7 mRNA versus HPV DNA biomarker in cervical cancer screening of a group of Macedonian women.
    Duvlis S; Popovska-Jankovic K; Arsova ZS; Memeti S; Popeska Z; Plaseska-Karanfilska D
    J Med Virol; 2015 Sep; 87(9):1578-86. PubMed ID: 25880030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organised screening for cervical cancer in France: a cost-effectiveness assessment.
    Barré S; Massetti M; Leleu H; De Bels F
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e014626. PubMed ID: 28988162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-utility and budget impact analyses of cervical cancer screening using self-collected samples for HPV DNA testing in Thailand.
    Kositamongkol C; Kanchanasurakit S; Mepramoon E; Talungchit P; Chaopotong P; Kengkla K; Chaisathaphol T; Saokaew S; Phisalprapa P
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):2413. PubMed ID: 38049773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA and HPV DNA Assays for the Detection and Screening of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Infection among Woman with Cervical Lesions in China.
    Wang HY; Lee D; Park S; Kim G; Kim S; Han L; Yubo R; Li Y; Park KH; Lee H
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(17):7633-40. PubMed ID: 26625774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary cervical cancer screening with an HPV mRNA test: a prospective cohort study.
    Sørbye SW; Fismen S; Gutteberg TJ; Mortensen ES; Skjeldestad FE
    BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011981. PubMed ID: 27515759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
    Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PCR-reverse dot blot human papillomavirus genotyping as a primary screening test for cervical cancer in a hospital-based cohort.
    Kang Y; Sun P; Mao X; Dong B; Ruan G; Chen L
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e29. PubMed ID: 30887754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience of Combined Liquid Based Cervical Cytology and High-Risk HPV mRNA for Cervical Cancer Screening in Thammasat University Hospital.
    Muangto T; Chanthasenanont A; Lertvutivivat S; Nanthakomon T; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4409-4413. PubMed ID: 27797253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence of positive screening test results and agreement between cytology and human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical cancer screening in North-Western Romania.
    Şuteu O; Blaga ML; Nygård M; Leinonen MK; Nicula F; Păiş R; Coza D; Cadariu PA; Melnic A; Andreassen T; Hashim D; Weiderpass E
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 31033568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
    Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain.
    Ibáñez R; Mareque M; Granados R; Andía D; García-Rojo M; Quílez JC; Oyagüez I
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):178. PubMed ID: 33902553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and effectiveness of HPV mRNA testing in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arbyn M; Simon M; de Sanjosé S; Clarke MA; Poljak M; Rezhake R; Berkhof J; Nyaga V; Gultekin M; Canfell K; Wentzensen N
    Lancet Oncol; 2022 Jul; 23(7):950-960. PubMed ID: 35709810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece.
    Skroumpelos A; Agorastos T; Constantinidis T; Chatzistamatiou K; Kyriopoulos J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226335. PubMed ID: 31830114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.