These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35867178)

  • 21. Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the role-modeling cost-conscious behaviors scale.
    Menezes MS; Gusmão MM; de Araújo Santana RN; Aguiar CVN; Mendonça DR; Barros RA; Silva MG; Lins-Kusterer L
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):151. PubMed ID: 31096964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Knowledge about dietary fibres (KADF): development and validation of an evaluation instrument through structural equation modelling (SEM).
    Guiné RP; Duarte J; Ferreira M; Correia P; Leal M; Rumbak I; Barić IC; Komes D; Satalić Z; Sarić MM; Tarcea M; Fazakas Z; Jovanoska D; Vanevski D; Vittadini E; Pellegrini N; Szűcs V; Harangozó J; El-Kenawy A; El-Shenawy O; Yalçın E; Kösemeci C; Klava D; Straumite E
    Public Health; 2016 Sep; 138():108-18. PubMed ID: 27178131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Riemannian Newton and trust-region algorithms for analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis.
    Liu Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Feb; 74(1):139-163. PubMed ID: 32715469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cluster-based factor rotation.
    Yamamoto M; Jennrich RI
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 23398639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Comparison of Reliability Estimation Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Exploratory Structural Equation Models.
    Fu Y; Wen Z; Wang Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):205-224. PubMed ID: 35185157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.
    Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F; Bollen KA
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):564-594. PubMed ID: 34097200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Approximated Penalized Maximum Likelihood for Exploratory Factor Analysis: An Orthogonal Case.
    Jin S; Moustaki I; Yang-Wallentin F
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 29876715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factor structure of the PANAS and the relationship between positive and negative affect in polio survivors.
    Kwon C; Kalpakjian CZ; Roller S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2010; 32(15):1300-10. PubMed ID: 20156054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating the construct validity of Stress Overload Scale-Short using exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Mu W; Duan W
    J Health Psychol; 2020 Jun; 25(7):913-921. PubMed ID: 29119830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of Path Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling in Nutrition and Dietetics.
    Harris JE; Gleason PM
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Nov; 122(11):2023-2035. PubMed ID: 35863617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Examine Caregiver Distress and Its Contributors.
    Li W; Manuel DG; Isenberg SR; Tanuseputro P
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2024 May; 25(5):817-825.e5. PubMed ID: 38341185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Reevaluation of the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ).
    Gomez R; Watson S
    J Relig Health; 2023 Jun; 62(3):2112-2130. PubMed ID: 35930213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying the Strength of General Factors in Psychopathology: A Comparison of CFA with Maximum Likelihood Estimation, BSEM, and ESEM/EFA Bifactor Approaches.
    Murray AL; Booth T; Eisner M; Obsuth I; Ribeaud D
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(6):631-643. PubMed ID: 29787294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A penalized likelihood method for multi-group structural equation modelling.
    Huang PH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 29500879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model.
    Nestler S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):870-889. PubMed ID: 33094388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Awareness Is Bliss: How Acquiescence Affects Exploratory Factor Analysis.
    D'Urso ED; Tijmstra J; Vermunt JK; De Roover K
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Jun; 83(3):433-472. PubMed ID: 37187696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and validation of questionnaire assessing the perception of hospital patient safety practices in public health facilities of India.
    Krishnamoorthy Y; Samuel G; Elangovan V; Kanth K; Krishnan M; Sinha I
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2022 Nov; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 36281952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of structural equation and multidimensional Rasch modeling approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Wolfe EW; Singh K
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):212-21. PubMed ID: 22357124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models.
    Moshagen M; Bader M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):2901-2922. PubMed ID: 37950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiple Local Solutions and Geomin Rotation.
    Hattori M; Zhang G; Preacher KJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(6):720-731. PubMed ID: 28952786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.