These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35867812)
21. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia. Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Follow-up with histopathology and HPV testing on LSIL cytology in China's largest academic woman's hospital. Tao X; Zhang H; Zhang H; Xiao J; Li J; Zhou X; Wang L; Zhao C Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):258-266. PubMed ID: 30892831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Applicability of On-Site Evaluation of Cervical Cytology Smears Stained with Toluidine Blue to Reduce Unsatisfactory Results. Tummidi S; Shankaralingappa A; Sharmila V Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 36215977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear. Rahnama P; Faghihzadeh S; Ziaei S Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15670299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cytomorphologic Features of Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma in Liquid-Based Preparations. Schwock J; Starova B; Khan ZF; Mirkovic J; Parra-Herran C; Ko HM; Rouzbahman M; Ghorab Z Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 33152741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears. Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Histopathologic follow-up and human papillomavirus DNA test results in 290 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test results. Gao FF; Austin RM; Zhao C Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):377-86. PubMed ID: 21774093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Rates and Detection of Abnormal Cervical Cytology Between Conventional Papanicolaou Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology (Sure Path®). Kituncharoen S; Tantbirojn P; Niruthisard S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8491-4. PubMed ID: 26745107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of cobas 4800 HPV assay in SurePath Papanicolaou specimens for cervical cancer screening. Guo M; Shlyakhova N; Khanna A; Tinnirello AA; Schmeler KM; Hwang J; Sturgis EM; Stewart J J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 33967024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Papanicolaou smear findings in solid-organ transplant recipients compared with normal subjects according to the Bethesda 2001 system. Ok Atılgan A; Tepeoğlu M; Haberal AN; Durukan E; Kuşcu E; Haberal M Exp Clin Transplant; 2015 Apr; 13 Suppl 1():219-22. PubMed ID: 25894158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices. Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears. Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Analysis of factors influencing the false-negative diagnosis of cervical/vaginal liquid based cytology]. Ma DY; Dong Y; Feng H; Wang TT; Zhao J Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 49(8):806-811. PubMed ID: 32746547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand. Phaliwong P; Pariyawateekul P; Khuakoonratt N; Sirichai W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29802695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study. Strander B; Andersson-Ellström A; Milsom I; Rådberg T; Ryd W Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 17724676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience. Bowditch RC; Clarke JM; Baird PJ; Greenberg ML Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):870-8. PubMed ID: 26174002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The significance of hyperkeratosis in pap smears with squamous intraepithelial lesion. Izadi-Mood N; Sarmadi S; Alijani S; Sanii S Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):379-82. PubMed ID: 22846642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates. Rozemeijer K; Penning C; Siebers AG; Naber SK; Matthijsse SM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; de Kok IM Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Jan; 27(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 26458884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The significance of mild squamous atypia on cytology. Dew JE; Athanasatos P; Hacker NF Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov; 35(4):443-5. PubMed ID: 8717576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short interval between two Pap smears: effect on the result of the second smear? A prospective randomized trial. Kolben TM; Bergauer F; Moeckel J; Boettcher B; Thaler CJ; Kolben T; Crispin A; Dannecker C; Mahner S; Gallwas J Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 295(6):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28405743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]