These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3586792)

  • 1. [Cochlear implant--current questions].
    Burian K; Eisenwort B; Klasek O
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Mar; 66(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 3586792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experiences with the Vienna auditory prosthesis].
    Burian K; Eisenwort B
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Feb; 68(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 2706067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Eisenwort B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Vienna Cochlear Implant in patients with obliteration of the cochlea.
    Kürsten R; Cozzarini W; Eisenwort B; Denk DM; Zrunek M; Burian K
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Jan; 104(1 Pt 1):79-82. PubMed ID: 8295460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Psychophysical data and speech comprehension after 2 years with the Clark/Nucleus prosthesis].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E; Laszig R; Mohme-Hesse K
    HNO; 1988 May; 36(5):188-92. PubMed ID: 3170272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prognostic indications within the scope of the selection of cochlear implant patients].
    Burian K; Klasek O
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Apr; 68(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 2742645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophonic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Risberg A; Agelfors E; Lindström B; Bredberg G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():156-63. PubMed ID: 2356722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation at under 12 months: report on 10 patients.
    Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Guida M; Colletti L; Fiorino FG
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):445-9. PubMed ID: 15744155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Gomolin RH; Green JE; Shapiro WH; Hoffman RA; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1997 May; 18(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 9149829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Results and experiences with 55 cochlear implantations].
    Pedersen CB; Jochumsen U; Madsen S; Koefoed-Nielsen B; Johansen LV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(40):5346-50. PubMed ID: 11036450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Ashbaugh C; Telian SA
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 8892567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.