191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35868232)
1. Maturation of Speech-in-Speech Recognition for Whispered and Voiced Speech.
Buss E; Miller MK; Leibold LJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3117-3128. PubMed ID: 35868232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Target and Masker Fundamental Frequency Contour Depth on School-Age Children's Speech Recognition in a Two-Talker Masker.
Flaherty MM; Buss E; Libert K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):400-414. PubMed ID: 36580582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developmental Effects in Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Perception Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch.
Leibold LJ; Buss E; Calandruccio L
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):935-945. PubMed ID: 29369288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
Flaherty MM; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):927-937. PubMed ID: 30334835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
Corbin NE; Bonino AY; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
Buss E; Leibold LJ; Porter HL; Grose JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.
Leibold LJ; Browning JM; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):259-267. PubMed ID: 31365355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
Flaherty MM; Browning J; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 33538428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of Masked Speech Detection Thresholds in 2- to 15-year-old Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
Bonino AY; Ramsey ME; Pancoast ES; Vance EA
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1712-1726. PubMed ID: 33928913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Switching Streams Across Ears to Evaluate Informational Masking of Speech-on-Speech.
Calcus A; Schoof T; Rosen S; Shinn-Cunningham B; Souza P
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 31107365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.
Wasiuk PA; Lavandier M; Buss E; Oleson J; Calandruccio L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Dec; 148(6):3527. PubMed ID: 33379934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aging and speech-on-speech masking.
Helfer KS; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 18091104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
