These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35868572)
1. The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology. Yousif J; Adlam T; Grant-Kels JM; Farshchian M J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Nov; 87(5):1225-1226. PubMed ID: 35868572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Teratogenic, unregulated, vitamin A acne supplements, and Roe v Wade: Response to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology". Zamil DH; Wang LK; Paidisetty PS; Asad U; Ren V J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e289. PubMed ID: 36780948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of the Dobbs decision on marginalized populations: A letter in reply to the Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology. Wong NS; Grant-Kels JM; Farshchian M J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e285. PubMed ID: 36427664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications of the Dobbs decision on marginalized populations: Letter in reply to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology". Khanna R; Khanna R; Larson AR J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e287-e288. PubMed ID: 36528269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling. Poliak A; Satybaldiyeva N; Strathdee SA; Leas EC; Rao R; Smith D; Ayers JW JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):1002-1004. PubMed ID: 35767270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US Supreme Court ends constitutional right to abortion. Tanne JH BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1575. PubMed ID: 35760421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The US Supreme Court is wrong to disregard evidence on the harm of banning abortion. Nature; 2022 May; 605(7909):193-194. PubMed ID: 35513454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Texas court grants woman with non-viable pregnancy right to abortion. Tanne JH BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2908. PubMed ID: 38084504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The judgment of the Supreme Court American statement on abortion: an ″earthquake″ with unintended consequences]. Díez Fernández JA Cuad Bioet; 2022; 33(109):351-352. PubMed ID: 36493419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Texas court hears challenge to state's strict abortion ban by women who say they were harmed. Tanne JH BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2863. PubMed ID: 38049174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. We're horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade-but abortion is not a universal right in the UK. Graham S BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o1945. PubMed ID: 35977739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The fall of Roe Lewandowska M BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1608. PubMed ID: 35768122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Gordon A Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]