These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes. Bartleman A West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The politics of abortion. Gearty C J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism. Kreimer SF N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Abortion and Constitution: United States and West Germany. Kommers DP Am J Comp Law; 1977; 25(2):255-85. PubMed ID: 11663731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Supreme Court and legitimate state interest. Stewart RG Ripon Forum; 1973 Apr; 9(7):8-9. PubMed ID: 11663550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Overturning of late-term abortion ban is let stand. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1998 Mar; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The health system and the Supreme Court decision; An affirmative response. Knowles JH Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 4805724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The court and a conflict of principles. Callahan S Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 330462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The far-reaching impact of abortion bans: reproductive care and beyond. Stein RA; Katz A; Chervenak FA Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2023 Feb; 28(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 36369860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. United States Supreme Court and abortion: part 2. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(3):343-4. PubMed ID: 11643547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion. Macklin R Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ignorance of abortion law can lead to court. HORTY JF Mod Hosp; 1962 Sep; 99():107-9. PubMed ID: 14449089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions. Corns CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. How overturning Roe Cox D BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o2075. PubMed ID: 36028247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Unborn in the USA: what happened and what's next for Roe Silberner J BMJ; 2022 May; 377():o1184. PubMed ID: 35580891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]