BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3586886)

  • 1. The relevance of a biological definition of life to fundamental rights.
    Main EJ
    Med Law; 1987; 6(3):189-209. PubMed ID: 3586886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To what do we have moral obligations and why? I.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6482):1646-7. PubMed ID: 3924205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To what do we have moral obligations and why? II.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6483):1734-6. PubMed ID: 3924233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro fertilisation: the major issues.
    Iglesias T
    J Med Ethics; 1984 Mar; 10(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 6708062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human embryos and the argument from potential.
    Gillon R
    J Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; 17(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 1870083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion and the golden rule.
    Hare RM
    Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(3):201-22. PubMed ID: 11661183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical ethics and the value of human life.
    Khatchadourian H
    Philos Context; 1984; 14():42-50. PubMed ID: 11651860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pregnancy, obstetrics and the moral status of the fetus.
    Gillon R
    J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 3351880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ethical responsibilities at issue.
    Adams EM
    In Vitro; 1977 Oct; 13(10):595-611. PubMed ID: 924449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion and the Good Samaritan.
    Prior WJ
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1982; 3():79-90. PubMed ID: 11655880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metaphysics and medical ethics: a reply.
    Gillett G
    J Med Ethics; 1994 Mar; 20(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 8035442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion: from the perspective of responsibility.
    Gardner EC
    Perkins J; 1977; 30(3):10-28. PubMed ID: 11658311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethics and embryos.
    Poplawski N; Gillett G
    J Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1870084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion and the pursuit of happiness.
    Rossi P
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1982; 3():61-77. PubMed ID: 11655879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Let's keep metaphysics out of medical ethics: a critique of Poplawski and Gillett.
    Leavitt FJ
    J Med Ethics; 1992 Dec; 18(4):206-9. PubMed ID: 1460650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do human cells have rights?
    Warnock M
    Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thomson's violinist and conjoined twins.
    Himma KE
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1999; 8(4):428-35; discussion 435-9. PubMed ID: 10513300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioethics and the process of embodiment.
    Engelhardt HT
    Perspect Biol Med; 1975; 18(4):486-500. PubMed ID: 1165979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does human gene therapy raise new ethical questions?
    Tauer CA
    Hum Gene Ther; 1990; 1(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 2078583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-identification and the morality of abortion.
    Lusby K
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.