These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35869615)

  • 21. A prospective, split-mouth study comparing tilted implants with angulated connection versus conventional implants with angulated abutment.
    Van Weehaeghe M; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 19(6):989-996. PubMed ID: 29034578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Caricasulo R; Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Fantozzi G; Cucchi A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):653-664. PubMed ID: 29761902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-Year Prospective Randomized Comparative Assessment of Anterior Maxillary Single Implants with Different Abutment Interfaces.
    Cooper LF; Reside G; Stanford C; Barwacz C; Feine J; Nader SA; Scheyer T; McGuire M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):150-158. PubMed ID: 30695089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal Bone Remodeling around healing Abutment vs Final Abutment Placement at Second Stage Implant Surgery: A 12-month Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nader N; Aboulhosn M; Berberi A; Manal C; Younes R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27084856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Immediate positioning of definitive abutments versus repeated abutment replacements in immediately loaded implants: effects on bone healing at the 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Grandi T; Guazzi P; Samarani R; Garuti G
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 22518376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of new immediate tissue level abutment on crestal bone stability of subcrestally placed implants: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Linkevicius T; Linkevicius R; Gineviciute E; Alkimavicius J; Mazeikiene A; Linkeviciene L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Apr; 23(2):259-269. PubMed ID: 33527729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Pieri F; Aldini NN; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 21365053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimum Abutment Height to Eliminate Bone Loss: Influence of Implant Neck Design and Platform Switching.
    Spinato S; Galindo-Moreno P; Bernardello F; Zaffe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):405–411. PubMed ID: 28817742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
    King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.
    Balmer M; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):290-299. PubMed ID: 29330869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. One abutment-one time versus a provisional abutment in immediately loaded post-extractive single implants: a 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Grandi T; Guazzi P; Samarani R; Maghaireh H; Grandi G
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 24977249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing the Clinical Outcome of Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Treated with Immediate Individualized CAD/CAM Healing Abutments and Conventional Healing Abutments for Single-Tooth Implants in Esthetic Areas Over 12 Months: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Wang L; Wang T; Lu Y; Fan Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):977-984. PubMed ID: 34698724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nonremoval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Degidi M; Nardi D; Daprile G; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):794-805. PubMed ID: 23458566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A; Pérez-Sayáns M; Fernández-Barbero JE; O'Valle F; Padial-Molina M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):630-642. PubMed ID: 35831919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of Abutment Design and Platform Switching on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with 1-Year Results.
    Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2021; 41(4):547-553. PubMed ID: 34328473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Strietzel FP; Neumann K; Hertel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):342-58. PubMed ID: 24438506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants.
    Gultekin BA; Gultekin P; Leblebicioglu B; Basegmez C; Yalcin S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 23748314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biologic width around different implant-abutment interface configurations. A radiographic evaluation of the effect of horizontal offset and concave abutment profile in the canine mandible.
    Caram SJ; Huynh-Ba G; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Cochran DL; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1114-22. PubMed ID: 25216137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic accuracy of the implant stability quotient in monitoring progressive peri-implant bone loss: An experimental study in dogs.
    Monje A; Insua A; Monje F; Muñoz F; Salvi GE; Buser D; Chappuis V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 30267449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-year post-loading results of a randomised, controlled, split-mouth trial comparing implants with different prosthetic interfaces and design in partially posterior edentulous mandibles.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Moy PK
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 24892113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.