134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35869768)
1. [Value of ultrasonic S-Detect technique in diagnosis of breast masses].
Cheng Y; Xia Q; Wang J; Xie H; Yu Y; Liu H; Yao Z; Hu J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2022 Jul; 42(7):1044-1049. PubMed ID: 35869768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of S-detect combined with virtual touch imaging quantification in ultrasound for diagnosis of breast mass.
Liu M; He F; Xiao J
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Aug; 47(8):1089-1098. PubMed ID: 36097777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system for distinguishing breast masses: a prospective multicenter study.
Wei Q; Yan YJ; Wu GG; Ye XR; Jiang F; Liu J; Wang G; Wang Y; Song J; Pan ZP; Hu JH; Jin CY; Wang X; Dietrich CF; Cui XW
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4046-4055. PubMed ID: 35066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential diagnosis of breast cancer assisted by S-Detect artificial intelligence system.
Xia Q; Cheng Y; Hu J; Huang J; Yu Y; Xie H; Wang J
Math Biosci Eng; 2021 Apr; 18(4):3680-3689. PubMed ID: 34198406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of S-Detect for the differential diagnosis of breast masses on ultrasound: a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis.
Li J; Sang T; Yu WH; Jiang M; Hunag SY; Cao CL; Chen M; Cao YW; Cui XW; Dietrich CF
Med Ultrason; 2020 May; 22(2):211-219. PubMed ID: 32399528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast lesions of BI-RADS 4].
Liang YC; Jia CM; Xue Y; Lü Q; Chen F; Wang JJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 May; 98(19):1498-1502. PubMed ID: 29804418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Diagnostic Value of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound Combined With VOCAL in the Vascular Distribution of Breast Masses.
Wang H; Yan B; Yue L; He M; Liu Y; Li H
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 31053481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of BI-RADS-US 4a lesions less than 2 cm in diameter.
Yu MQ; Zhang LL; Jiang LP; Zhou AY
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 83(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 35599475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasensitive Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging for Characterizing Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.
Gong P; Song P; Huang C; Lok UW; Tang S; Yu Y; Meixner DD; Ruddy KJ; Ghosh K; Fazzio RT; Ling W; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3128-3136. PubMed ID: 31530420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Power Doppler Ultrasound and a New Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique (AngioPLUS) for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Jung HK; Park AY; Ko KH; Koh J
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Nov; 37(11):2689-2698. PubMed ID: 29528130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses?
Lee EJ; Jung HK; Ko KH; Lee JT; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1803-11. PubMed ID: 23423637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of shear wave elastography and BI-RADS in identification of solid breast masses.
Zheng X; Li F; Xuan ZD; Wang Y; Zhang L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Dec; 21(1):183. PubMed ID: 34852775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study.
Neuschler EI; Lavin PT; Tucker FL; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Dogan BE; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Young CA; Butler R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel approach in the evaluation of ultrasound BI-RADS 3 & 4 breast masses with a combination method of elastography & Doppler.
Reghunath A; Mittal MK; Chintamani C; Prasad R
Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):355-366. PubMed ID: 34854427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Kong WT; Zhou WJ; Wang Y; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2019 Oct; 46(4):459-466. PubMed ID: 31102067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of various vascular features of breast cancer by age.
Lin J; Lin W; Xu L; Lin T
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 80(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 34719486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of ultrasound Angio-PLUS imaging for detecting blood flow in breast masses and comparison with color Doppler for differentiating benign from malignant masses.
Mohindra N; Jain N; Yadav S; Agrawal V; Mishra P; Mishra A; Agarwal G
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jun; 64(6):2087-2095. PubMed ID: 36890701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
