These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35870045)

  • 1. Establishing thresholds for meaningful within-individual change using longitudinal item response theory.
    Bjorner JB; Terluin B; Trigg A; Hu J; Brady KJS; Griffiths P
    Qual Life Res; 2023 May; 32(5):1267-1276. PubMed ID: 35870045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to establish thresholds of within-individual meaningful change on a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale score in atopic dermatitis.
    Dias-Barbosa C; Puelles J; Fofana F; Gabriel S; Rodriguez D; Chavda R; Piketty C
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):881-893. PubMed ID: 36417089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating meaningful thresholds for multi-item questionnaires using item response theory.
    Terluin B; Koopman JE; Hoogendam L; Griffiths P; Terwee CB; Bjorner JB
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1819-1830. PubMed ID: 36780033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold.
    Griffiths P; Sims J; Williams A; Williamson N; Cella D; Brohan E; Cocks K
    Qual Life Res; 2023 May; 32(5):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 36401757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Ackerman IN; Harris IA; Cashman K; Rowden N; Lorimer M; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 35901436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don't stratify on the baseline score!
    Terluin B; Roos EM; Terwee CB; Thorlund JB; Ingelsrud LH
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2773-2782. PubMed ID: 34041680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining Thresholds for Meaningful Change for the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Total and Item-Specific Scores in Chronic Migraine.
    Houts CR; Wirth RJ; McGinley JS; Cady R; Lipton RB
    Headache; 2020 Oct; 60(9):2003-2013. PubMed ID: 32862469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions.
    Qin S; Nelson L; Williams N; Williams V; Bender R; McLeod L
    Qual Life Res; 2023 May; 32(5):1277-1293. PubMed ID: 36371770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?
    Karhade AV; Bernstein DN; Desai V; Bedair HS; O'Donnell EA; Tanaka MJ; Bono CM; Harris MB; Schwab JH; Tobert DG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Sep; 480(9):1672-1681. PubMed ID: 35543521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients.
    Terluin B; Eekhout I; Terwee CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():90-100. PubMed ID: 28093262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA?
    Berliner JL; Brodke DJ; Chan V; SooHoo NF; Bozic KJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):149-157. PubMed ID: 26956248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Correction of Sports-Related Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Percentage of Possible Improvement.
    Carton P; Filan D
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2020 Jan; 8(1):2325967119894747. PubMed ID: 32030345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.
    Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Gerhart CRB; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Bingham JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 481(4):702-714. PubMed ID: 36398323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meaningful Change Scores in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Ingelsrud LH; Terwee CB; Terluin B; Granan LP; Engebretsen L; Mills KAG; Roos EM
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Apr; 46(5):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 29517924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA.
    Berliner JL; Brodke DJ; Chan V; SooHoo NF; Bozic KJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):321-9. PubMed ID: 26201420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likely change indexes improve estimates of individual change on patient-reported outcomes.
    Peipert JD; Hays RD; Cella D
    Qual Life Res; 2023 May; 32(5):1341-1352. PubMed ID: 35921034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?
    Ogura K; Yakoub MA; Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Nikolic Z; Boland PJ; Healey JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2148-2158. PubMed ID: 32568896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the minimal clinically important difference be determined in a French-speaking population with primary hip replacement using one PROM item and the Anchor strategy?
    Putman S; Dartus J; Migaud H; Pasquier G; Girard J; Preda C; Duhamel A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102830. PubMed ID: 33524632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A confirmatory factor analysis approach was found to accurately estimate the reliability of transition ratings.
    Griffiths P; Terluin B; Trigg A; Schuller W; Bjorner JB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():36-45. PubMed ID: 34464687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The challenges inherent with anchor-based approaches to the interpretation of important change in clinical outcome assessments.
    Wyrwich KW; Norman GR
    Qual Life Res; 2023 May; 32(5):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 36396874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.