These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35870698)

  • 1. Notip: Non-parametric true discovery proportion control for brain imaging.
    Blain A; Thirion B; Neuvial P
    Neuroimage; 2022 Oct; 260():119492. PubMed ID: 35870698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Permutation and parametric tests for effect sizes in voxel-based morphometry of gray matter volume in brain structural MRI.
    Dickie DA; Mikhael S; Job DE; Wardlaw JM; Laidlaw DH; Bastin ME
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 26253778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. All-Resolutions Inference for brain imaging.
    Rosenblatt JD; Finos L; Weeda WD; Solari A; Goeman JJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():786-796. PubMed ID: 30056198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.
    Friston KJ; Holmes A; Poline JB; Price CJ; Frith CD
    Neuroimage; 1996 Dec; 4(3 Pt 1):223-35. PubMed ID: 9345513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical null and false discovery rate analysis in neuroimaging.
    Schwartzman A; Dougherty RF; Lee J; Ghahremani D; Taylor JE
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 18547821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms II: A Method to Obtain First-Level Analysis Residuals with Uniform and Gaussian Spatial Autocorrelation Function and Independent and Identically Distributed Time-Series.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Lacey S; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 29161884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A non-parametric statistical test to compare clusters with applications in functional magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Fujita A; Takahashi DY; Patriota AG; Sato JR
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4949-62. PubMed ID: 25185759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Equitable Thresholding and Clustering: A Novel Method for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clustering in AFNI.
    Cox RW
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):529-538. PubMed ID: 31115252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision thresholding on fMRI activation maps using the Hilbert-Huang transform.
    Kuo PC; Liou M
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Jul; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35797976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping informative clusters in a hierarchical [corrected] framework of FMRI multivariate analysis.
    Xu R; Zhen Z; Liu J
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e15065. PubMed ID: 21152081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrated cluster-wise significance measure for fMRI analysis.
    Ge Y; Chen G; Waltz JA; Hong LE; Kochunov P; Chen S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jun; 43(8):2444-2459. PubMed ID: 35233859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hidden Markov event sequence models: toward unsupervised functional MRI brain mapping.
    Faisan S; Thoraval L; Armspach JP; Foucher JR; Metz-Lutz MN; Heitz F
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 15691723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields.
    Chumbley JR; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18603449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayes estimate of primary threshold in clusterwise functional magnetic resonance imaging inferences.
    Ge Y; Hare S; Chen G; Waltz JA; Kochunov P; Elliot Hong L; Chen S
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(25):5673-5689. PubMed ID: 34309050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MIDAS: Regionally linear multivariate discriminative statistical mapping.
    Varol E; Sotiras A; Davatzikos C
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():111-126. PubMed ID: 29524624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data.
    Heller R; Stanley D; Yekutieli D; Rubin N; Benjamini Y
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):599-608. PubMed ID: 16952467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms I: Revisiting Cluster-Based Inferences.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28927289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.