322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35870886)
41. Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Prediction Algorithms for Genomic Prediction and Breeding of Aquatic Animals.
Wang K; Yang B; Li Q; Liu S
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 36553514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cross-species outlier detection reveals different evolutionary pressures between sister species.
Cullingham CI; Cooke JEK; Coltman DW
New Phytol; 2014 Oct; 204(1):215-229. PubMed ID: 24942459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric methods in genomic evaluation.
Sahebalam H; Gholizadeh M; Hafezian H; Farhadi A
J Genet; 2019 Nov; 98():. PubMed ID: 31767821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Genome-wide association studies for yield component traits in a macadamia breeding population.
O'Connor K; Hayes B; Hardner C; Nock C; Baten A; Alam M; Henry R; Topp B
BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 32131725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Genome-wide shifts in climate-related variation underpin responses to selective breeding in a widespread conifer.
MacLachlan IR; McDonald TK; Lind BM; Rieseberg LH; Yeaman S; Aitken SN
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Mar; 118(10):. PubMed ID: 33649218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.
Ousmael KM; Cappa EP; Hansen JK; Hendre P; Hansen OK
BMC Genomics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):9. PubMed ID: 38166623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4198-204. PubMed ID: 21787955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population.
Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; Queiroz SA
BMC Genet; 2012 Nov; 13():100. PubMed ID: 23134637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs.
Wang X; Zhang Z; Du H; Pfeiffer C; Mészáros G; Ding X
Genet Sel Evol; 2024 Jun; 56(1):49. PubMed ID: 38926647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Genomic prediction in plants: opportunities for ensemble machine learning based approaches.
Farooq M; van Dijk ADJ; Nijveen H; Mansoor S; de Ridder D
F1000Res; 2022; 11():802. PubMed ID: 37035464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.
Knoch D; Werner CR; Meyer RC; Riewe D; Abbadi A; Lücke S; Snowdon RJ; Altmann T
Theor Appl Genet; 2021 Apr; 134(4):1147-1165. PubMed ID: 33523261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat.
Shahi D; Guo J; Pradhan S; Khan J; Avci M; Khan N; McBreen J; Bai G; Reynolds M; Foulkes J; Babar MA
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):298. PubMed ID: 35413795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of Bayesian alphabet and GBLUP based on different marker density for genomic prediction in Alpine Merino sheep.
Zhu S; Guo T; Yuan C; Liu J; Li J; Han M; Zhao H; Wu Y; Sun W; Wang X; Wang T; Liu J; Tiambo CK; Yue Y; Yang B
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34849779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. High density linkage maps, genetic architecture, and genomic prediction of growth and wood properties in Pinus radiata.
Freeman JS; Slavov GT; Butler JB; Frickey T; Graham NJ; Klápště J; Lee J; Telfer EJ; Wilcox P; Dungey HS
BMC Genomics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):731. PubMed ID: 36307760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Seven Breeding Selection Traits Improved by QTL Identification in Flax.
Lan S; Zheng C; Hauck K; McCausland M; Duguid SD; Booker HM; Cloutier S; You FM
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Feb; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 32106624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Moradi MH; IlCho C; Naserkheil M; Ibáñez-Escriche N
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):1. PubMed ID: 28093066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
