142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35871237)
1. Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X.
Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Rai AS; Leung VC; Ahmed A; Rai AS
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 42(12):3933-3940. PubMed ID: 35871237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two ophthalmoscopes for direct ophthalmoscopy.
Mandal N; Harborne P; Bradley S; Salmon N; Holder R; Denniston AK; Murray PI
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 39(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 20796260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of conventional and wide field direct ophthalmoscopy on medical students' self-confidence for fundus examination: a 1-year follow-up.
Ayub G; Souza RB; de Albuquerque AM; de Vasconcellos JPC
BMC Med Educ; 2021 Sep; 21(1):507. PubMed ID: 34565378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What optic disc parameters are most accurately assessed using the direct ophthalmoscope?
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
Eye (Lond); 2001 Jun; 15(Pt 3):283-7. PubMed ID: 11450721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical cup-to-disc ratio: agreement between direct ophthalmoscopic estimation, fundus biomicroscopic estimation, and scanning laser ophthalmoscopic measurement.
Watkins R; Panchal L; Uddin J; Gunvant P
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jun; 80(6):454-9. PubMed ID: 12808406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison Study of Funduscopic Examination Using a Smartphone-Based Digital Ophthalmoscope and the Direct Ophthalmoscope.
Wu AR; Fouzdar-Jain S; Suh DW
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 May; 55(3):201-206. PubMed ID: 29796680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy vs conventional direct ophthalmoscopy as a teaching tool for medical students: the COSMOS study.
Kim Y; Chao DL
Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():391-401. PubMed ID: 30858689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smart phone ophthalmoscopy: a potential replacement for the direct ophthalmoscope.
Mamtora S; Sandinha MT; Ajith A; Song A; Steel DHW
Eye (Lond); 2018 Nov; 32(11):1766-1771. PubMed ID: 30042410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Panoptic versus conventional ophthalmoscope.
McComiskie JE; Greer RM; Gole GA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 32(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 15180833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Stereometric parameters of the optic disc. Comparison between a simultaneous non-mydriatic stereoscopic fundus camera (KOWA WX 3D) and the Heidelberg scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRT IIII)].
Januschowski K; Blumenstock G; Rayford CE; Bartz-Schmidt KU; Schiefer U; Ziemssen F
Ophthalmologe; 2011 Oct; 108(10):957-62. PubMed ID: 21904837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Optic nerve head analysis using the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (CSLO) of big cups versus normal cups].
Ouertani A; Tounsi L; Khammari C; Bouden J; Mili-Boussen I
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 19515313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smartphone ophthalmoscopy: patient and student practitioner perceptions.
Nagra M; Huntjens B
J Med Syst; 2019 Dec; 44(1):10. PubMed ID: 31797206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education.
Gilmour-White JA; Picton A; Blaikie A; Denniston AK; Blanch R; Coleman J; Murray PI
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):201. PubMed ID: 31196068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of optic nerve head topographic parameters with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Durukan AH; Yucel I; Akar Y; Bayraktar MZ
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 32(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 15180837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optic disc assessment in the emergency department: a comparative study between the PanOptic and direct ophthalmoscopes.
Petrushkin H; Barsam A; Mavrakakis M; Parfitt A; Jaye P
Emerg Med J; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1007-8. PubMed ID: 21998469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial.
Wang H; Liao X; Zhang M; Pang CP; Chen H
Med Educ Online; 2023 Dec; 28(1):2176201. PubMed ID: 36762913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Small-Group Training in Teaching Medical Students Integral Clinical Eye Examination Skills.
Lee JY; Gallo RA; Alabiad CR
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017); 2020 Jan; 12(1):e79-e86. PubMed ID: 32728655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. eFOCUS 2: A randomised crossover trial of smartphone fundoscopy and direct ophthalmoscopy aiming to improve optic disc interpretation by medical students with e-learning support.
Dunn HP; Marks S; Teo KZ; Dunn SM; Healey PR; White AJ
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 49(7):704-713. PubMed ID: 34291862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope.
Lowe J; Cleland CR; Mgaya E; Furahini G; Gilbert CE; Burton MJ; Philippin H
J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():743263. PubMed ID: 26457197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
