173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35871300)
1. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with the Double Digital Scanning (DDS) Technique: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
Chochlidakis K; Romeo D; Ercoli C; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):761-765. PubMed ID: 35871300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.
Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Gotsis S; Bokhary A; Sicilia E; Kudara Y; Bedrossian A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with Double Digital Scanning: Accuracy of Fit Assessment.
Papaspyridakos P; AlFulaij F; Bokhary A; Sallustio A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 35176178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication.
Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian A; Kudara Y; Ntovas P; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):452-457. PubMed ID: 36779654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reverse scan body: The scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses.
Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian EA; Ntovas P; Kudara Y; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):186-191. PubMed ID: 37721306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
Marinis A; Papaspyridakos P; Sicilia E; Bernandes SR; Touloumi F; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Gotsis S; Chen YW; Vazouras K; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Workflow With a Triple Scanning Technique for Implant Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Zone.
Papaspyridakos P; Mariano A; De Souza A; Kotina E; Kudara Y; Kang K
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 33001661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A fully digital approach for implant fixed complete dentures: A case report.
Meneghetti P; Moura GF; Tavelli L; Li J; Siqueira R; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 34213055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cumulative effect of error in the digital workflow for complete-arch implant-supported frameworks: An in vitro study.
Pan Y; Tsoi JKH; Lam WYH; Zhao K; Pow EHN
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Sep; 33(9):886-899. PubMed ID: 35770363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in 25 Edentulous Arches: A Laboratory Observational Study.
Ben Yehuda D; Weber HP; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Muftu A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):718-724. PubMed ID: 32648318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary complete-arch implant-supported restoration: A digital scanning and maxillomandibular relationship workflow.
Ahmed WM; Verhaeghe TV; McCullagh APG
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 32171489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital bar prototype technique for full-arch rehabilitation on implants.
Monaco C; Arena A; Pallotti G; di Fiore A; Scheda L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2019 Jun; 150(6):549-555. PubMed ID: 30955701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans.
Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M
J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
