These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35871300)

  • 41. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study.
    Hassan B; Gimenez Gonzalez B; Tahmaseb A; Greven M; Wismeijer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 27881321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Accuracy of photogrammetry and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an
    Sun YJ; Ma BW; Yue XX; Lin X; Geng W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):168-172. PubMed ID: 35152653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Complete Digital Restoration: Implant-Supported Prosthesis Using Rapid Prototyping and a Model-Free Approach.
    Michelinakis G; Nikolidakis D; Apostolakis D
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2021 Apr; 42(4):182-186. PubMed ID: 33960803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: An in vitro study?
    Pan Y; Tsoi JKH; Lam WYH; Chen Z; Pow EHN
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Mar; 33(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 34971468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Solid index impression protocol: a hybrid workflow for high accuracy and passive fit of full-arch implant-supported restorations.
    Mandelli F; Zaetta A; Cucchi A; Mangano FG
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(2):161-181. PubMed ID: 32555769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Combining Intraoral and Face Scans for the Design and Fabrication of Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Implant-Supported Bars for Maxillary Overdentures.
    Mangano F; Mangano C; Margiani B; Admakin O
    Scanning; 2019; 2019():4274715. PubMed ID: 31531155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study.
    Knechtle N; Wiedemeier D; Mehl A; Ender A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 33612335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Digital workflow for implant-supported fixed complete dentures based on backwards planning in an edentulous patient.
    Al-Haj Husain N; Molinero-Mourelle P; Janner SFM; Brägger U; Özcan M; Schimmel M; Revilla-Léon M; Abou-Ayash S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 34006066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of Different Complete-Arch Digital Scanning Techniques with a Combined Healing Abutment-Scan Body System.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Santos AT; Kökat AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 35235622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast.
    Koch GK; Gallucci GO; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 26803173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.
    Sabouhi M; Bajoghli F; Abolhasani M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25506645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part I: 3D printed and milled palatal stimulation plate for trisomy 21.
    Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 31973720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant-supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow.
    Rutkunas V; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P; Mangano F; Gedrimiene A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 22(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 32026603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of scan body design on accuracy of the implant position as transferred to a virtual definitive implant cast.
    Revilla-León M; Smith Z; Methani MM; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):918-923. PubMed ID: 32493568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.