These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35871472)

  • 21. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
    Daou EE; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal Adaptation of Provisional CAD/CAM Restorations Fabricated Using Various Simulated Digital Cement Space Settings.
    Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B; Şeker E; Shah K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 30231093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
    Yildirim B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually.
    Rayyan MM; Aboushelib M; Sayed NM; Ibrahim A; Jimbo R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):414-9. PubMed ID: 26001490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques.
    Abduljawad DE; Rayyan MR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):707-714. PubMed ID: 35294099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between direct chairside and digitally fabricated temporary crowns.
    Abdullah AO; Pollington S; Liu Y
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Nov; 37(6):957-963. PubMed ID: 30135337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal Accuracy and Internal Fit of Dental Copings Fabricated by Modern Additive and Subtractive Digital Technologies.
    Nelson N; K S J; Sunny K
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2017 Mar; 25(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 28569447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
    Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of CAD/CAM and Conventional Cement Retained Implant-Supported Single Crowns.
    Nejatidanesh F; Shakibamehr AH; Savabi O
    Implant Dent; 2016 Feb; 25(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 26505132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: An
    Dureja I; Yadav B; Malhotra P; Dabas N; Bhargava A; Pahwa R
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(4):314-320. PubMed ID: 30449959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Production tolerance of conventional and digital workflow in the manufacturing of glass ceramic crowns.
    Mahmood DJH; Braian M; Larsson C; Wennerberg A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 30686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.