These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35871483)

  • 1. Spatiotemporal connectivity dynamics in spatially structured populations.
    Drake J; Lambin X; Sutherland C
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Oct; 91(10):2050-2060. PubMed ID: 35871483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics.
    Hodgson JA; Moilanen A; Thomas CD
    Ecology; 2009 Jun; 90(6):1608-19. PubMed ID: 19569375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic spatio-temporal patterns of metapopulation occupancy in patchy habitats.
    Bertassello LE; Bertuzzo E; Botter G; Jawitz JW; Aubeneau AF; Hoverman JT; Rinaldo A; Rao PSC
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Jan; 8(1):201309. PubMed ID: 33614074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability in primary productivity determines metapopulation dynamics.
    Fernández N; Román J; Delibes M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27053739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal.
    Schooley RL; Branch LC
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1708-22. PubMed ID: 19831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology.
    Howell PE; Muths E; Hossack BR; Sigafus BH; Chandler RB
    Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 29453767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intermediate disturbance in experimental landscapes improves persistence of beetle metapopulations.
    Govindan BN; Feng Z; DeWoody YD; Swihart RK
    Ecology; 2015 Mar; 96(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 26236869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative importance of local and regional processes to metapopulation dynamics.
    Dallas TA; Saastamoinen M; Schulz T; Ovaskainen O
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Mar; 89(3):884-896. PubMed ID: 31705670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A spatially structured metapopulation model with patch dynamics.
    Xu D; Feng Z; Allen LJ; Swihart RK
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Apr; 239(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 16199058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term drivers of persistence and colonization dynamics in spatially structured amphibian populations.
    Falaschi M; Giachello S; Lo Parrino E; Muraro M; Manenti R; Ficetola GF
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1530-1539. PubMed ID: 33355400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-scale processes in metapopulations: contributions of stage structure, rescue effect, and correlated extinctions.
    Sutherland C; Elston DA; Lambin X
    Ecology; 2012 Nov; 93(11):2465-73. PubMed ID: 23236917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Species traits, patch turnover and successional dynamics: when does intermediate disturbance favour metapopulation occupancy?
    Mestre F; Pita R; Mira A; Beja P
    BMC Ecol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 31900154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of landscape-dependent disturbance and dispersal in metapopulation persistence.
    Elkin CM; Possingham H
    Am Nat; 2008 Oct; 172(4):563-75. PubMed ID: 18759558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exact asymptotic analysis for metapopulation dynamics on correlated dynamic landscapes.
    Cornell SJ; Ovaskainen O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Nov; 74(3):209-25. PubMed ID: 18692082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial asymmetries in connectivity influence colonization-extinction dynamics.
    Acevedo MA; Fletcher RJ; Tremblay RL; Meléndez-Ackerman EJ
    Oecologia; 2015 Oct; 179(2):415-24. PubMed ID: 26054613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local epiphyte establishment and future metapopulation dynamics in landscapes with different spatiotemporal properties.
    Belinchón R; Harrison PJ; Mair L; Várkonyi G; Snäll T
    Ecology; 2017 Mar; 98(3):741-750. PubMed ID: 27984632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk spreading, connectivity, and optimal reserve spacing.
    Blowes SA; Connolly SR
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Jan; 22(1):311-21. PubMed ID: 22471092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes.
    Hanski I; Ovaskainen O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Aug; 64(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 12804876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating social and ecological data to model metapopulation dynamics in coupled human and natural systems.
    Van Schmidt ND; Kovach T; Kilpatrick AM; Oviedo JL; Huntsinger L; Hruska T; Miller NL; Beissinger SR
    Ecology; 2019 Jun; 100(6):e02711. PubMed ID: 30927267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity.
    Ovaskainen O; Hanski I
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):281-302. PubMed ID: 11878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.