These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35872405)

  • 1. Dissociable effects of attention and expectation on perceptual sensitivity to action-outcomes.
    George N; Mary Sunny M
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Aug; 103():103374. PubMed ID: 35872405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active inference, sensory attenuation and illusions.
    Brown H; Adams RA; Parees I; Edwards M; Friston K
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 23744445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Spatiotemporal Link of Temporal Expectations: Contextual Temporal Expectation Is Independent of Spatial Attention.
    Tal-Perry N; Yuval-Greenberg S
    J Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 42(12):2516-2523. PubMed ID: 35091506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory and decisional components of endogenous attention are dissociable.
    Banerjee S; Grover S; Ganesh S; Sridharan D
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Oct; 122(4):1538-1554. PubMed ID: 31268805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time-course of feature-based attention effects dissociated from temporal expectation and target-related processes.
    Moerel D; Grootswagers T; Robinson AK; Shatek SM; Woolgar A; Carlson TA; Rich AN
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6968. PubMed ID: 35484363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threat Expectation Does Not Improve Perceptual Discrimination despite Causing Heightened Priority Processing in the Frontoparietal Network.
    Haddara N; Rahnev D
    J Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 44(15):. PubMed ID: 38395615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus expectations do not modulate visual event-related potentials in probabilistic cueing designs.
    den Ouden C; Zhou A; Mepani V; Kovács G; Vogels R; Feuerriegel D
    Neuroimage; 2023 Oct; 280():120347. PubMed ID: 37648120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parallel processing streams for motor output and sensory prediction during action preparation.
    Stenner MP; Bauer M; Heinze HJ; Haggard P; Dolan RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Mar; 113(6):1752-62. PubMed ID: 25540223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal expectation and attention jointly modulate auditory oscillatory activity in the beta band.
    Todorovic A; Schoffelen JM; van Ede F; Maris E; de Lange FP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120288. PubMed ID: 25799572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Intricate Interplay of Spatial Attention and Expectation: a Multisensory Perspective.
    Zuanazzi A; Noppeney U
    Multisens Res; 2020 Mar; 33(4-5):383-416. PubMed ID: 31940592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces.
    Yi DJ; Kelley TA; Marois R; Chun MM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16507300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior Expectations of Motion Direction Modulate Early Sensory Processing.
    Aitken F; Turner G; Kok P
    J Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 40(33):6389-6397. PubMed ID: 32641404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality.
    Menceloglu M; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2732-2744. PubMed ID: 31254259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action.
    Hughes G; Waszak F
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1632-40. PubMed ID: 21352924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive.
    Bays PM; Flanagan JR; Wolpert DM
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Feb; 4(2):e28. PubMed ID: 16402860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expectation mismatch: differences between self-generated and cue-induced expectations.
    Gaschler R; Schwager S; Umbach VJ; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Oct; 46 Pt 1():139-57. PubMed ID: 24971824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Action biases perceptual decisions toward expected outcomes.
    Yon D; Zainzinger V; de Lange FP; Eimer M; Press C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1225-1236. PubMed ID: 33289575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans.
    Eckstein MP; Mack SC; Liston DB; Bogush L; Menzel R; Krauzlis RJ
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():5-19. PubMed ID: 23298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory attenuation is modulated by the contrasting effects of predictability and control.
    Harrison AW; Mannion DJ; Jack BN; Griffiths O; Hughes G; Whitford TJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118103. PubMed ID: 33957233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals.
    Voss M; Ingram JN; Wolpert DM; Haggard P
    PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e2866. PubMed ID: 18682736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.