These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35877656)

  • 21. Estimating willingness-to-pay for health care: A discrete choice experiment accounting for non-attendance to the cost attribute.
    Sever I; Verbič M; Sever EK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Oct; 25(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 30677196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does prior knowledge of food fraud affect consumer behavior? Evidence from an incentivized economic experiment.
    Meerza SIA; Gustafson CR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225113. PubMed ID: 31794556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health Is Wealth: Study on Consumer Preferences and the Willingness to Pay for Ecological Agricultural Product Traceability Technology: Evidence from Jiangxi Province China.
    Chen X; Shang J; Zada M; Zada S; Ji X; Han H; Ariza-Montes A; Ramírez-Sobrino J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceived Value of Information Attributes: Accounting for Consumer Heterogeneous Preference and Valuation for Traceable Agri-Food.
    Liu R; Wang J; Liang J; Ma H; Liang F
    Foods; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36832785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of free-from symbols on consumer perceptions of healthiness, quality and intention to buy baked food products.
    Castellini G; Savarese M; Graffigna G
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2023 May; 74(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 37254896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Consumer preferences for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from in-depth interviews, think aloud protocols and choice experiments.
    Risius A; Janssen M; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():246-254. PubMed ID: 28223237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Heterogeneity of Consumer Preferences for Meat Safety Attributes in Traditional Markets.
    Nugraha WS; Yang SH; Ujiie K
    Foods; 2021 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33809468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attitudes towards honey among Italian consumers: A choice experiment approach.
    Cosmina M; Gallenti G; Marangon F; Troiano S
    Appetite; 2016 Apr; 99():52-58. PubMed ID: 26719101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consumer preferences for food labels on tomatoes in Germany - A comparison of a quasi-experiment and two stated preference approaches.
    Meyerding SGH
    Appetite; 2016 Aug; 103():105-112. PubMed ID: 27037221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers' preferences and willingness to pay.
    Risius A; Hamm U
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():9-14. PubMed ID: 27792916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Looking behind the choice of organic: A cross-country analysis applying Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Models.
    Yeh CH; Hartmann M; Gorton M; Tocco B; Amilien V; Steinnes KK
    Appetite; 2021 Dec; 167():105591. PubMed ID: 34246714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of information in consumers' preferences for eco-sustainable genetic improvements in plant breeding.
    Borrello M; Cembalo L; Vecchio R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0255130. PubMed ID: 34324542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consumers' Trade-Off between Nutrition and Health Claims under Regulation 1924/2006: Insights from a Choice Experiment Analysis.
    Viscecchia R; Nocella G; De Devitiis B; Bimbo F; Carlucci D; Seccia A; Nardone G
    Nutrients; 2019 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 31779205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consumer Preferences for Cheese Products with Quality Labels: The Case of Parmigiano Reggiano and Comté.
    Menozzi D; Yeh CH; Cozzi E; Arfini F
    Animals (Basel); 2022 May; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 35625145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of sequential information on consumers' willingness to pay for credence food attributes.
    Botelho A; Dinis I; Lourenço-Gomes L; Moreira J; Costa Pinto L; Simões O
    Appetite; 2017 Nov; 118():17-25. PubMed ID: 28760349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can consumer food choices contribute to reduce environmental impact? The case of cisgenic apples.
    De Marchi E; Cavaliere A; Bacenetti J; Milani F; Pigliafreddo S; Banterle A
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 681():155-162. PubMed ID: 31103653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health Innovation in Patty Products. The Role of Food Neophobia in Consumers' Non-Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Purchase Intention and Hedonic Evaluation.
    Kallas Z; Vitale M; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30791660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consumer trust and willingness to pay for establishing a market-based animal welfare assurance scheme for broiler chickens.
    Heinola K; Latvala T; Niemi JK
    Poult Sci; 2023 Jul; 102(7):102765. PubMed ID: 37247584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceived subjective versus objective knowledge: Consumer valuation of genetically modified certification on food producing plants.
    Rihn A; Khachatryan H; Wei X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255406. PubMed ID: 34411110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.