These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35878773)

  • 41. A stability assessment tool for anaerobic codigestion.
    Cook SM; Skerlos SJ; Raskin L; Love NG
    Water Res; 2017 Apr; 112():19-28. PubMed ID: 28122271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of digestate recirculation ratios on biogas production and methane yield of continuous dry anaerobic digestion.
    Chen R; Li Z; Feng J; Zhao L; Yu J
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Nov; 316():123963. PubMed ID: 32795872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates.
    Zhang C; Wang F; Pei M; Qiu L; Qiang H; Yao Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 31242650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Shifts of acidogenic bacterial group and biogas production by adding two industrial residues in anaerobic co-digestion with cattle manure.
    da Silva GH; Barros NO; Santana LAR; Carneiro JDC; Otenio MH
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2021; 56(14):1503-1511. PubMed ID: 34903145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Nutrient contributions and biogas potential of co-digestion of feedstocks and dairy manure.
    Ma G; Neibergs JS; Harrison JH; Whitefield EM
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jun; 64():88-95. PubMed ID: 28351541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dry anaerobic ammonia-methane production from chicken manure.
    Abouelenien F; Kitamura Y; Nishio N; Nakashimada Y
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 82(4):757-64. PubMed ID: 19184596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cow manure stabilizes anaerobic digestion of cocoa waste.
    Acosta N; Duh Kang I; Rabaey K; De Vrieze J
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():508-516. PubMed ID: 33678560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing the potential for up-cycling recovered resources from anaerobic digestion through microbial protein production.
    Verbeeck K; De Vrieze J; Pikaar I; Verstraete W; Rabaey K
    Microb Biotechnol; 2021 May; 14(3):897-910. PubMed ID: 32525284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dry anaerobic digestion of chicken manure coupled with membrane separation of ammonia.
    Bayrakdar A; Sürmeli RÖ; Çalli B
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 244(Pt 1):816-823. PubMed ID: 28841786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Producing high-strength liquor from mesophilic batch acidification of chicken manure.
    Abendroth C; Wünsche E; Luschnig O; Bürger C; Günther T
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Mar; 33(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 25672618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Developing a vacuum thermal stripping - acid absorption process for ammonia recovery from anaerobic digester effluent.
    Ukwuani AT; Tao W
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():108-115. PubMed ID: 27697680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Improved methane fermentation of chicken manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle.
    Abouelenien F; Fujiwara W; Namba Y; Kosseva M; Nishio N; Nakashimada Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Aug; 101(16):6368-73. PubMed ID: 20378337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Modeling of ammonia speciation in anaerobic digesters.
    Hafner SD; Bisogni JJ
    Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4105-14. PubMed ID: 19664794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Pretreatment of anaerobic digestion effluent with ammonia stripping and biogas purification.
    Lei X; Sugiura N; Feng C; Maekawa T
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 145(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 17178436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In search of the optimal inoculum to substrate ratio during anaerobic co-digestion of spent coffee grounds and cow manure.
    Akyol Ç
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Nov; 38(11):1278-1283. PubMed ID: 32356493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Implications from distinct sulfate-reducing bacteria populations between cattle manure and digestate in the elucidation of H
    St-Pierre B; Wright AG
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Jul; 101(13):5543-5556. PubMed ID: 28389712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of sludge recirculation rate and mixing time on performance of a prototype single-stage anaerobic digester for conversion of food wastes to biogas and energy recovery.
    Ratanatamskul C; Saleart T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(8):7092-8. PubMed ID: 25864735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of tannic acid combined with fluoride and lignosulfonic acid on anaerobic digestion in the agricultural waste management chain.
    Dalby FR; Hansen MJ; Feilberg A; Kümmel S; Nikolausz M
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Jul; 307():123171. PubMed ID: 32203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Blending based optimisation and pretreatment strategies to enhance anaerobic digestion of poultry manure.
    Rodriguez-Verde I; Regueiro L; Lema JM; Carballa M
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():521-531. PubMed ID: 29126822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Swine manure valorization in fabrication of nutrition and energy.
    Giwa AS; Ali N; Asif M
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):9921-9933. PubMed ID: 33074416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.