These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35878952)

  • 1. Attentional Demand of a Movement Sequence Guided by Visual-Spatial and by Motor Representations.
    Pfeifer C; Panzer S; Shea CH
    J Mot Behav; 2023; 55(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35878952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-Task and Single-Task Practice Does Not Influence the Attentional Demands of Movement Sequence Representations.
    Pfeifer C; Harenz J; Shea CH; Panzer S
    J Mot Behav; 2024; 56(4):462-474. PubMed ID: 38484757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Across-task binding: The development of a representation in learning a continuous movement sequence.
    Panzer S; Pfeifer C; Daniel L; Gaschler R; Haider H; Shea CH
    Hum Mov Sci; 2024 Apr; 94():103195. PubMed ID: 38359609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dyad training protocols and the development of a motor sequence representation.
    Panzer S; Haab T; Massing M; Pfeifer C; Shea CH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Oct; 201():102947. PubMed ID: 31722259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of eye-movements on the development of a movement sequence representation during observational and physical practice.
    Massing M; Blandin Y; Panzer S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():1-8. PubMed ID: 29107928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observational training in visual half-fields and the coding of movement sequences.
    Ellenbuerger T; Boutin A; Panzer S; Blandin Y; Fischer L; Schorer J; Shea CH
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1436-48. PubMed ID: 22939848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scheduling observational and physical practice: influence on the coding of simple motor sequences.
    Ellenbuerger T; Boutin A; Blandin Y; Shea CH; Panzer S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1260-73. PubMed ID: 22494362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of attentional demands during motor learning: validity of a dual-task probe paradigm.
    Goh HT; Gordon J; Sullivan KJ; Winstein CJ
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 24447033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. General motor representations are developed during action-observation.
    Hayes SJ; Elliott D; Bennett SJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 204(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 20502885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Varying Effects of Dual Tasks on the Performance of Motor Skills across Practice.
    Luan M; Mirifar A; Beckmann J; Ehrlenspiel F
    J Mot Behav; 2021; 53(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 34024264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observation and physical practice: coding of simple motor sequences.
    Gruetzmacher N; Panzer S; Blandin Y; Shea CH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1111-23. PubMed ID: 21302186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Attentional Direction on Sub-Stages of Preparing for Motor Skill Execution Across Practice.
    Luan M; Mirifar A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2021 Jun; 128(3):1292-1309. PubMed ID: 33928825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of concurrent visual feedback on coding of on-line and pre-planned movement sequences.
    Leinen P; Shea CH; Panzer S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():92-100. PubMed ID: 25594377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related effects in interlimb practice on coding complex movement sequences.
    Panzer S; Gruetzmacher N; Fries U; Krueger M; Shea CH
    Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Jun; 30(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 21349597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses.
    Hodgson TL; Müller HJ; O'Leary MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 10089763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-manual transfer and practice: coding of simple motor sequences.
    Panzer S; Krueger M; Muehlbauer T; Kovacs AJ; Shea CH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 19389659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kinesthetic vs. visual focus: No evidence for effects of practice modality in representation types after action imagery practice and action execution practice.
    Dahm SF; Rieger M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2023 Dec; 92():103154. PubMed ID: 37844453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning.
    Bapi RS; Doya K; Harner AM
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 May; 132(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 10853941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice-Not Task Difficulty-Mediated the Focus of Attention Effect on a Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Task.
    Yamada M; Lohse KR; Rhea CK; Schmitz RJ; Raisbeck LD
    Percept Mot Skills; 2022 Oct; 129(5):1504-1524. PubMed ID: 35723022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time course of learning sequence representations in action imagery practice.
    Dahm SF; Rieger M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2023 Feb; 87():103050. PubMed ID: 36549085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.