These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35879445)
1. Comparison of Two-Port and Three-Port Approaches in Robotic Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Han KN; Lee JH; Hong JI; Kim HK World J Surg; 2022 Oct; 46(10):2517-2525. PubMed ID: 35879445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Sleeve Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Using Mini-Thoracotomy and an Optimized Robot-Assisted Technique. Shaolin T; Yonggeng F; Poming K; Longyong M; Cheng S; Chunshu F; Licheng W; Qunyou T; Bo D Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211051547. PubMed ID: 34736363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term Survival Based on the Surgical Approach to Lobectomy For Clinical Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Robotic, Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery, and Thoracotomy Lobectomy. Yang HX; Woo KM; Sima CS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Huang J; Finley DJ; Rizk NP; Rusch VW; Jones DR; Park BJ Ann Surg; 2017 Feb; 265(2):431-437. PubMed ID: 28059973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of three-port and four-port Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a retrospective study. Jin W; Zheng L; Fan X; Wang H; Wang Q; Yang C J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jun; 19(1):377. PubMed ID: 38926727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-weighted comparison with thoracoscopic and open surgery. Qiu T; Zhao Y; Xuan Y; Qin Y; Niu Z; Shen Y; Jiao W J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Sep; 160(3):838-846.e2. PubMed ID: 31924355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison Results of Three-Port Robot-Assisted and Uniportal Video-Assisted Lobectomy for Functional Recovery Index in the Treatment of Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Diao H; Xu L; Li X; Wang Y; Peng Z Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):2470-2481. PubMed ID: 38105381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful Transition to Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy With Previous Proficiency in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy. Merritt RE; Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM Innovations (Phila); 2019 Jun; 14(3):263-271. PubMed ID: 31050320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the National Cancer Data Base. Yang CF; Sun Z; Speicher PJ; Saud SM; Gulack BC; Hartwig MG; Harpole DH; Onaitis MW; Tong BC; D'Amico TA; Berry MF Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1037-42. PubMed ID: 26822346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Versus Video-assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Thoracotomy Approach. Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM; Richardson M; Abdel-Rasoul M; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Merritt RE Clin Lung Cancer; 2020 May; 21(3):214-224.e2. PubMed ID: 31685354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New Technique for Introducing a Surgical Stapler during Robot-Assisted Lobectomy for Lung Cancer. Usuda J; Inoue T; Sonokawa T; Matsumoto M; Enomoto Y; Suzuki K; Tomioka Y J Nippon Med Sch; 2022 May; 89(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 34526458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting. Augustin F; Bodner J; Maier H; Schwinghammer C; Pichler B; Lucciarini P; Pratschke J; Schmid T Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Aug; 398(6):895-901. PubMed ID: 23754154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Bendixen M; Jørgensen OD; Kronborg C; Andersen C; Licht PB Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jun; 17(6):836-844. PubMed ID: 27160473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]