221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35880651)
1. Development of a vendor neutral MRI distortion quality assurance workflow.
Walker A; Chlap P; Causer T; Mahmood F; Buckley J; Holloway L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 23(10):e13735. PubMed ID: 35880651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial clinical experience with a radiation oncology dedicated open 1.0T MR-simulation.
Glide-Hurst CK; Wen N; Hearshen D; Kim J; Pantelic M; Zhao B; Mancell T; Levin K; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Siddiqui MS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5201. PubMed ID: 26103190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.
Walker A; Liney G; Holloway L; Dowling J; Rivest-Henault D; Metcalfe P
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1982-91. PubMed ID: 25832089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of 3D geometric distortion of magnetic resonance imaging scanners commissioned for radiation therapy planning.
Torfeh T; Hammoud R; Perkins G; McGarry M; Aouadi S; Celik A; Hwang KP; Stancanello J; Petric P; Al-Hammadi N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 34(5):645-53. PubMed ID: 26795695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commissioning of a 4D MRI phantom for use in MR-guided radiotherapy.
Schneider S; Dolde K; Engler J; Hoffmann A; Pfaffenberger A
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 30367485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of real-time cine MR imaging distortion on 0.35 T MRgRT with concentric cine imaging QA phantom.
Marasini S; Cole M; Curcuru A; Dyke LM; Gach HM; Flores R; Kim T
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Mar; 69(6):. PubMed ID: 38408387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A daily end-to-end quality assurance workflow for MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy on MR-Linac.
Chen X; Ahunbay E; Paulson ES; Chen G; Li XA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):205-212. PubMed ID: 31799753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. System-dependent image distortion related to gantry positions of a 0.35 T MRgRT: Characterization and the corresponding correction.
Marasini S; Quinn B; Cole M; Flores R; Kim T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13826. PubMed ID: 36354747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assurance measurements of geometric accuracy for magnetic resonance imaging-based radiotherapy treatment planning.
Ranta I; Kemppainen R; Keyriläinen J; Suilamo S; Heikkinen S; Kapanen M; Saunavaara J
Phys Med; 2019 Jun; 62():47-52. PubMed ID: 31153398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive MR imaging QA of 0.35 T MR-Linac using a multi-purpose large FOV phantom: A single-institution experience.
Marasini S; Zhang H; Dyke L; Cole M; Quinn B; Curcuru A; Gu B; Flores R; Kim T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 24(10):e14066. PubMed ID: 37307238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of a novel large field of view phantom and a software module for the quality assurance of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging.
Torfeh T; Hammoud R; McGarry M; Al-Hammadi N; Perkins G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):939-49. PubMed ID: 25882440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of MR stereotactic imaging and image co-registration accuracy for 3 different MR scanners by 3 different methods/phantoms: phantom and patient study.
Paštyková V; Novotný J; Veselský T; Urgošík D; Liščák R; Vymazal J
J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(Suppl1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30544292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI geometric distortion: Impact on tangential whole-breast IMRT.
Walker A; Metcalfe P; Liney G; Batumalai V; Dundas K; Glide-Hurst C; Delaney GP; Boxer M; Yap ML; Dowling J; Rivest-Henault D; Pogson E; Holloway L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):7-19. PubMed ID: 28297426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commissioning and implementing a Quality Assurance program for dedicated radiation oncology MRI scanners.
Poulin E; Lacroix F; Archambault L; Jutras JD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 25(3):e14185. PubMed ID: 38332556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correcting geometric image distortions in slice-based 4D-MRI on the MR-linac.
Keesman R; van de Lindt TN; Juan-Cruz C; van den Wollenberg W; van der Bijl E; Nowee ME; Sonke JJ; van der Heide UA; Fast MF
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3044-3054. PubMed ID: 31111494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration.
Nousiainen K; Mäkelä T
MAGMA; 2020 Jun; 33(3):401-410. PubMed ID: 31646408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimizing magnetic resonance image geometric distortion at 7 Tesla for frameless presurgical planning using skin-adhered fiducials.
Kirby KM; Koons EK; Welker KM; Fagan AJ
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):694-701. PubMed ID: 36301228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First clinical experience of correcting phantom-based image distortion related to gantry position on a 0.35T MR-Linac.
Lewis BC; Shin J; Quinn B; Barberi E; Sievert D; Kim JS; Kim T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 22(11):21-28. PubMed ID: 34612567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of a novel commercial large field of view phantom for comprehensive MR imaging quality assurance of a 0.35T MRgRT system.
Lewis BC; Shin J; Maraghechi B; Quinn B; Cole M; Barberi E; Kim JS; Green O; Kim T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13535. PubMed ID: 35194946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integration of spatial distortion effects in a 4D computational phantom for simulation studies in extra-cranial MRI-guided radiation therapy: Initial results.
Kroll C; Dietrich O; Bortfeldt J; Kamp F; Neppl S; Belka C; Parodi K; Baroni G; Paganelli C; Riboldi M
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1646-1660. PubMed ID: 33220073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
