249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3588145)
1. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Dinamap monitor in infants and children.
Park MK; Menard SM
Pediatrics; 1987 Jun; 79(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 3588145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auscultatory measurement of arterial pressure during anaesthesia: a reassessment of Korotkoff sounds.
Pereira E; Prys-Roberts C; Dagnino J; Anger C; Cooper GM; Hutton P
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1985 Mar; 2(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 4018039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.
Loubser PG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Measurement of arterial blood pressure using the sphygmomanometer-S and the direct method].
Sapiński A; Szuman J; Jasiński J
Kardiol Pol; 1991; 35(9):174-6. PubMed ID: 1753563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An optical oscillometric method for neonatal and premature infant blood pressure monitoring.
Roeder RA; Geddes LA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19363328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of direct and indirect blood pressure measurements in anesthetized dogs.
Gains MJ; Grodecki KM; Jacobs RM; Dyson D; Foster RA
Can J Vet Res; 1995 Jul; 59(3):238-40. PubMed ID: 8521360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An automatic non-invasive method for the measurement of systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure].
Morel D; Suter P
Ann Anesthesiol Fr; 1981; 22(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 6113805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors.
Kawahara M
Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between the oscillometric and the auscultatory method for ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring.
Wiinberg N; Raymond IE; Bang LE; Malmqvist BB; Svendsen TL; Petersen LJ
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Jun; 1(3):187-191. PubMed ID: 10226224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ankle blood pressure measured by automatic oscillotonometry: a comparison with Doppler pressure measurements.
Adiseshiah M; Cross FW; Belsham PA
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Nov; 69(6):271-3. PubMed ID: 3426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
